emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ESDES School of Management vs Lyon Catholic University (UCLY) vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 87 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
- +Supportive environment and accessible services
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
- +Practical experience through internships and work-study
- +Skill development and career preparation
- +Supportive and multicultural learning environment
- +Practical application of knowledge
- +Broad international focus and cross-cultural learning
- +Strong professional development and recognized technical training
- +Opportunities for networking and future connections
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course content leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of responsiveness and clear communication from staff is a major complaint.
Nothing to show
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.
Nothing to show
This university exhibits a well-rounded performance, with exceptional strengths in **Location**, scoring a perfect 5. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are also highly rated, all at 4.33. Professors receive a solid score of 4. The areas that show room for improvement are Internationality, at 3.67, and Accommodations, which is the lowest-rated category at 3.33.
This institution garners high marks for its location and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.62. Professors and student life also received solid ratings of 4.00 and 4.10 respectively. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, rated at 3.57, and accommodation, which received a 3.25. Value for money is assessed at 3.76, indicating a generally positive but not outstanding performance.
Overall, the university garners positive ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** standing out as exceptional strengths. Professors and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest area, with ratings for Facilities and Location also being moderate. The university presents a well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in student experience and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
All reviews are positive, reflecting a ~100% positive sentiment. Students praise attentive teachers, good educational supervision, and lively student life. Some also appreciate international immersion opportunities and diverse classes.
With 16 out of 23 reviews being positive (~74%), students highlight strong program content and professional preparation. They appreciate skill development and practical application, alongside a friendly atmosphere and helpful professors.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~67% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent programs, a valuable international focus, and professional development opportunities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
