emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs Burgundy School of Business vs ESSCA School of Management vs CEFAM Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 95 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
- +Supportive environment and accessible services
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
- +Strong marketing & business programs
- +Excellent student support & community
- +Diverse academic pathways & practical experience
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors with poor communication.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses with a lack of student engagement.
- -Significant administrative and organizational issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
This institution presents a mixed picture in its evaluations. It shines brightest in **Location**, achieving a score of over 4.1, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.07 and **Professors** at 3.9. Conversely, **Accomodation** is its least favored aspect, with a rating of 3.37. The university also garners solid marks in Internationality and Value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
With ~87% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.93/5, students praise good knowledge transfer, specialization options, internship access, and vibrant campus life. A small portion of reviews mention unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
