emlyon business school vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs OP Jindal Global University - JGU

Side-by-side comparison from 211 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: emlyon business school (4.50)
emlyon business school: wins 2/7 categories
Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU: wins 0/7 categories
L'École de Design Nantes Atlantique: wins 0/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
OP Jindal Global University - JGU: wins 2/7 categories
Panjab University: wins 3/7 categories
RIMT University - RIMT: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Best programme: Art and Design
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
chandigarh, India
4.40
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Art Management
chandigarh, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.12
4.00
3.25
4.44
Win
3.89
Not rated
Location
4.66
3.91
3.00
4.75
3.50
4.88
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.13
4.00
3.25
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
Win
3.17
4.00
3.50
4.24
4.10
Not rated
Student life
4.30
4.30
3.00
3.75
3.88
4.38
Win
Not rated
Value
4.49
Win
3.96
4.00
2.75
3.94
4.30
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.68
4.00
2.00
4.59
Win
3.88
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Diverse student body and global community
  • +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
  • +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
  • +Supportive environment & welcoming community
  • +Prestigious European university for design
  • +Focus on practical application over theory
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Practical, real-world focus and curriculum
  • +Supportive faculty and positive learning environment
  • +Good career prospects and specialized programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Peaceful and motivating campus environment
  • +Strong academic and research resources

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
  • -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
  • -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum create learning difficulties.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -High fees and perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Poor quality of accommodation and food.
  • -Institutional focus on finances over student welfare and study quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to delayed and unclear communication regarding exams and results.
  • -Outdated facilities and a decline in university ranking are disappointing.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.

Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in its facilities, professor quality, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a strong rating of 4. While student life and location are rated a respectable 3, these areas represent opportunities for improvement compared to its more robust aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive offering.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **accommodations**, achieving a near-perfect score. Facilities also received a high rating. Conversely, the **location** was the least positively reviewed aspect. Student life, internationality, and value represent solid middle-ground strengths, with professors also scoring favorably.

Remarkably high scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **Location**, boasting an impressive 4.875. **Professors** also receive commendation at 4.5. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the area with the lowest rating at 3.888. The university demonstrates a strong performance in Student Life (4.375) and Value (4.3), with good marks also awarded for Internationality (4.1) and Accommodation (3.875).

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.

The university receives strong positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight a welcoming environment for international students and supportive teachers. Some desire more challenging main projects and theoretical lectures.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning, well-structured programs, and helpful faculty. A small portion, ~12%, expressed concerns about cost and facilities.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive faculty, and a peaceful campus. ~10% of feedback noted issues with examination management and slow results.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
29%
0%
50%
29%
60%
0%
4★
27%
54%
100%
25%
41%
30%
0%
3★
10%
16%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
6%
10%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
25%
6%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close