Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA vs Clermont School of Business vs EM Strasbourg Business School vs Digital College vs CESI

Side-by-side comparison from 162 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SHG Universities (5.00)
Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA: wins 1/7 categories
Clermont School of Business: wins 2/7 categories
EM Strasbourg Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Digital College: wins 0/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/7 categories
SHG Universities: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Clermont-Ferrand, France
4.50
Read more reviews
83 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor in International Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Paris, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Lisbon, Portugal
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.95
4.27
Win
3.94
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.46
4.42
4.35
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.10
4.37
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.27
4.63
4.22
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
4.46
Win
4.40
4.03
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.17
4.31
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.73
4.12
Win
3.89
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +International environment and diverse student life
  • +High-quality academics and supportive professors
  • +Engaging courses with practical applications
  • +Excellent teaching quality and practical learning
  • +Strong international environment and networking opportunities
  • +Modern facilities and supportive career services
  • +Supportive professors and engaging courses
  • +International environment and diverse opportunities
  • +Strong personal and professional development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
  • +International perspective and understanding of the industry
  • +Teachers as current specialists
Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including dirty and neglected campus areas and issues with pests in student residences and dining facilities.
  • -Significant administrative and management problems that negatively impact student experience.
  • -Poor teaching quality and incompetent professors are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of relevant curriculum and insufficient practical learning opportunities.
  • -Disappointing administrative support, particularly for international students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Some teaching staff lack proper validation.
  • -The overall program structure and facilities are considered unhelpful and outdated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
  • -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

With a strong emphasis on student experience, this university excels in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving ratings above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.27. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, which earned the lowest score at 3.73, followed by **Facilities** at 3.95. **Professors** and **Value** demonstrate solid performance, with ratings around 4.1.

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with exceptionally high marks in **Internationality** (4.63) and **Location** (4.42). Student life and professor quality also received strong scores. The **Accomodation** (4.12) appears to be the relatively weakest area, though still rated favorably. The university demonstrates a solid reputation across diverse aspects of student experience.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its highest-rated aspects being **Location** (4.35) and **Internationality** (4.22). Professors and Value also received positive marks, both scoring above 4.1. Conversely, **Facilities** (3.94) and **Accomodation** (3.89) represent the areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, ratings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Strasbourg reviews are predominantly positive (~97.6%), highlighting international atmosphere, knowledgeable professors, and engaging courses. A small fraction (~2.4%) notes issues with campus maintenance and facilities.

Nearly 95% of reviews are positive, highlighting modern facilities, an international environment, and practical, well-taught courses. A small fraction of feedback expresses disappointment with some teaching quality and program relevance.

With a 4.25/5 average, ~83% of 36 reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, interesting courses, and international opportunities. A single negative review (~3%) mentioned concerns about the job center and class atmosphere.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
63%
44%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
60%
28%
39%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
5%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
High-quality teaching

The ITIRI (faculty of translation) guarantees a high-quality linguistic preparation, as long as some practical classes that help understand what it would really be like to be a translator. There's an admission test and it costs 4500 per year. The master lasts 2 years.

Course - Corporate Finance and fintech

The course itself was great as it gave me ideas into a new world and now i have a better understanding and the know-how in fintech. Overall, teaching staff are professionnel and supporting in ensuring we get the best out of our time there

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close