Université Rennes-II-Haute-Bretagne vs Université de Rennes I vs Paris Graduate School of Digital Innovation - EPITECH vs IMT Atlantique – Graduate Engineering School vs INSA Rennes
Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and challenging courses
- +Welcoming atmosphere and cultural immersion
- +Expert faculty and diverse academic programs
- +Welcoming environment and engaging campus life
- +Beautiful and well-equipped campus facilities
- +Innovative, hands-on learning approach
- +Strong emphasis on independence and self-sufficiency
- +Challenging but rewarding educational experience
- +Strong French language support
- +Rigorous academic programs
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of adequate support and resources impacts student success.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disappointing.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of student well-being focus and a profit-driven approach that compromises educational quality.
- -Insufficient focus on soft skills development alongside technical education.
- -High cost relative to the perceived value or quality of education.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support was a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners positive marks across several key areas, with **Professors** receiving the highest rating at 4.5. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation are all rated a solid 4. The university also performs reasonably well in terms of Value, scoring 3.5. The primary area for potential improvement is **Internationality**, which received the lowest rating of 3.
Overall, this institution garners strong positive feedback. Student life and accommodation stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both achieving a score of approximately 4.17. The university also received solid ratings of 4 for facilities, professors, internationality, and value. Location is the lowest-scoring area, though still rated positively at 3.8.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside strong internationality. Location also scores well, contributing to a positive overall impression. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a moderate rating. The value proposition is considered good, reflecting a generally positive assessment with room for improvement in housing.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving high ratings. Areas of average performance include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Accommodation**. The university offers a well-rounded experience with particularly positive aspects in its infrastructure, student engagement, global outlook, and cost-effectiveness.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, the 2 reviews indicate overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%). Students praise the enriching experience, challenging courses, and supportive professors, particularly within the international exchange program.
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise the dynamic academic setting, diverse programs, expert faculty, and well-maintained facilities. Some mention a desire for better parking and cafeteria food.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with approximately 25% positive and 50% negative feedback. Recurring themes include a strong technical environment versus a lack of soft skills training, and concerns about the school's focus on profit over student well-being.
With a 4/5 average rating, student feedback is predominantly positive. One reviewer highlighted a challenging yet rewarding academic experience with French and English program requirements.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
IMT Atlantique Brest was an interesting phase in my academic life. Coming from an Anglophone educational system to a Francophone teaching style was quite a challenge at the beginning, but worthwhile in the end. My programme was in both French and English(60/40). Although I spoke a bit of French, it still required more knowledge to sail through the programme. This was made possible through the school's compulsory weekly French classes. The programme was very rigorous as we spent most of our time in class, in lab sessions or doing group projects. The professors are knowledgeable in their field and try to engage the students in each lesson, although some of them aren't good at transferring knowledge appropriately. The career seminars and job dating events were very beneficial in finding an internship and a job in the long run. Lastly, the intercultural environment helped me learn about different cultures, and also prepare me to work in multicultural teams in the real world. Overall, it was a good experience as I learned to study in a new language, make new friends and stand on my own in a new country. I just wish I did more research into the French teaching style before starting the programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show