Université de Lyon vs emlyon business school vs Jean Moulin Lyon 3 - JML vs ESDES School of Management vs IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale
Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert professors and practical industry experience
- +Strong research and innovation focus
- +Enriching and eye-opening learning experiences
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Practical application and industry relevance
- +Diverse academic programs and extensive choices
- +Supportive environment and accessible services
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Poor communication and unhelpful administrative staff are frustrating.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content feels irrelevant and not aligned with current industry needs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Exceptional ratings across most categories highlight the university's strengths. Facilities received the highest score at 4.5, closely followed by Professors and Value, both at 4.4. Student Life, Location, and Accommodations also scored well, indicating a well-rounded experience. Internationality received the lowest rating, though still positive at 4.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution shines with outstanding ratings in its facilities and location, both receiving a near-perfect score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.3. However, the ratings indicate professors are the weakest area, with a score of 3, while the overall value is rated a respectable 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All 6 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight valuable education, practical programs, and helpful staff. There is no negative feedback.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
With a 3.67 average rating from 3 reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~67%). Students highlight strong academic programs and diverse educational opportunities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show