Université de Lille vs SKEMA Business School vs Paris Graduate School of Digital Innovation - EPITECH vs EDHEC Business School vs JUNIA Graduate School of Science and Engineering
Side-by-side comparison from 226 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and well-trained faculty
- +Relevant and in-depth programs with ample lab work
- +Abundant opportunities and advanced facilities
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +Innovative, hands-on learning approach
- +Strong emphasis on independence and self-sufficiency
- +Challenging but rewarding educational experience
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Expert industry professionals and practical industry exposure
- +Challenging but valuable life sciences education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of career support and job prospects
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of student well-being focus and a profit-driven approach that compromises educational quality.
- -Insufficient focus on soft skills development alongside technical education.
- -High cost relative to the perceived value or quality of education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners excellent feedback for its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring a high 4.12. Internationality is also well-regarded at 3.98. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating at 3.74, closely followed by **Location** at 3.76. Professors and Value fall within a similar, moderate range.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside strong internationality. Location also scores well, contributing to a positive overall impression. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a moderate rating. The value proposition is considered good, reflecting a generally positive assessment with room for improvement in housing.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its facilities, professors, and internationality, all receiving perfect scores. Student life offers a moderate experience, while its value proposition is highly rated. However, significant drawbacks are evident in its location and accommodation, both of which received zero ratings, indicating these are areas of considerable concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~84% of feedback), highlighting advanced labs, diverse opportunities, and supportive lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded among the 45 reviews.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with approximately 25% positive and 50% negative feedback. Recurring themes include a strong technical environment versus a lack of soft skills training, and concerns about the school's focus on profit over student well-being.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's strong life sciences program and industry-experienced professionals. The curriculum is highlighted as valuable, though one review notes it can be stressful.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
