Université de La Rochelle vs EIGSI la Rochelle Engineering School vs Schiller International University vs Forward College vs Ecole des Ponts Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Forward College (4.70)
Université de La Rochelle: wins 1/7 categories
EIGSI la Rochelle Engineering School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
Forward College: wins 2/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 1/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Paris, France
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
29 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
3.92
4.43
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.47
Location
4.00
4.00
4.93
Win
4.81
4.60
Not rated
3.13
Professors
4.00
4.00
4.64
4.90
Win
4.83
Not rated
4.27
Internationality
4.50
3.00
4.93
Win
4.55
4.67
Not rated
3.87
Student life
4.50
4.00
4.15
4.57
Win
4.50
Not rated
4.20
Value
4.00
3.00
4.29
4.55
4.17
Not rated
4.67
Win
Accommodation
4.50
Win
4.00
3.62
4.29
3.33
Not rated
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and passionate professors
  • +Relevant courses and learning opportunities
  • +Pleasant city and campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Interactive and personalized learning with engaged professors
  • +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth
  • +Small class sizes for close student-professor relationships
  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Inflexible or irrelevant course content leads to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

With consistently strong scores across most aspects, the university excels in areas like Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality, all earning a 4.5. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also well-regarded at 4. Its Value rating sits at 4, indicating a good return on investment, with no areas falling below this solid performance.

Nothing to show

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This university garners strong praise, particularly for its **Professors** (4.89) and **Location** (4.81). **Student Life** (4.57), **Internationality** (4.55), and **Value** (4.55) also receive favorable scores. **Facilities** (4.43) and **Accommodation** (4.29) are rated well, though they represent the lowest scores in this assessment.

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Two reviews show a positive sentiment (100%), with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight relevant courses, engaging professors, and a good campus and city location.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

All 29 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.66/5. Students praise the interactive learning, international community, and supportive professors. They highlight academic and personal growth in a motivating environment.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

Nothing to show

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
71%
66%
50%
0%
47%
4★
100%
0%
21%
34%
50%
0%
47%
3★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
2★
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close