IE University vs Universidad Europea - UE vs Universidad Francisco de Vitoria vs Escuela de Diseño CEI - CEI vs Deusto Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 271 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and personalized guidance for academic and career success.
- +Excellent facilities, enriching coursework, and practical skill development.
- +Abundant opportunities and networking for future career prospects.
- +Modern teaching and attractive campus
- +Strong business opportunities and practical learning
- +Supportive faculty and international exchange programs
- +Excellent professors, practical learning, and strong academic programs.
- +Great campus facilities, resources, and student support services.
- +Welcoming atmosphere and positive student experiences.
- +Excellent and knowledgeable teachers
- +High-quality training and programs
- +Effective virtual learning environment
- +High academic standards and professional faculty
- +Focus on holistic development, including values and social impact
- +Rigorous and structured learning environment
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Disappointing academic quality and misleading marketing.
- -Poor program management and perceived lack of flexibility.
- -Uninspiring campus environment and limited student experience.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative staff.
- -Teachers are indifferent and unsupportive of student learning.
- -High costs for course materials.
- -Outdated facilities and poor condition of materials are a problem.
- -Inadequate teacher qualifications and poorly organized curriculum lead to issues.
- -Lack of relevant practical experience and misleading advertising are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues make the student experience frustrating.
- -Course content does not align with advertised practical applications.
- -A decline in staff cordiality and support after enrollment occurs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and transparency from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality stands out with an impressive rating, closely followed by an excellent score for Location. Student life and the quality of Professors also receive high marks. However, Accommodations represent the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Value for money and Facilities are rated favorably, though not as high as the top-performing categories.
Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly in **Internationality (4.6)** and **Facilities (4.33)**. Student Life and Professors also score well, both above 4.2. The weakest areas identified are **Accomodation (3.87)** and **Value (3.78)**, though these still represent a moderately positive rating.
Across various aspects, this institution garners a generally positive reception. Student life stands out as a particularly strong suit, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, the location received the lowest score, indicating an area for potential improvement. Other evaluated components, including facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and overall value, all fall within a respectable mid-range.
Overall, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. It excels in providing outstanding accommodation and a prime location, both receiving perfect scores. Student life and professor quality are also highly lauded. The weakest area, while still strong, is internationality, though it remains a positive aspect. Value for money is rated exceptionally highly, as are facilities.
The university's strongest aspect is its accommodation, receiving a perfect score. However, significant weaknesses are apparent across most other surveyed areas, with facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all scoring zero. This indicates considerable room for improvement in nearly all facets of the university experience outside of its housing provisions.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Approximately 96.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive faculty, and enriching academic/networking opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about academic standards or the campus environment.
Nearly 74% of 54 reviews are positive, highlighting modern teaching methods, spacious campuses, and good career opportunities. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) notes administrative issues and unengaged instructors.
With an average rating of 3.88/5, approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting great experiences, good organization, motivated professors, and practical learning. A small portion, about 6%, expressed negative feedback.
Feedback is split, with ~50% of reviews being negative. Positive feedback highlights excellent teachers and good training, while negative reviews cite disappointing practical application and unhelpful management after payment.
With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students praise exceptional academic standards and dedicated faculty. They also highlight the university's focus on shaping empathetic humans with a commitment to social justice and positive global impact.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
I chose this university because some friends who had studied there had told me it was a great experience, and it's true. It has excellent facilities and a faculty that always encourages you to do your best. They motivate you a lot and guide you in a way I hadn't seen before. They are very approachable professors and are attentive to how they can optimize your studies. I made good friends there, I have good memories of that experience, and I might even pursue some further studies because it left a very positive impression on me.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
The Faculty of Communication is clearly oriented to the journalist being the communication the second course. From here you find everything: material in poor condition, teachers who are teachers for the mere fact of being ex-students without being properly qualified, curriculum badly organized with repeated subjects and others of filling where they do not meet the teacher's guide , Impressive lack of practices or practices that have nothing to do with the sector, misleading advertising on the web (wide range of options that teachers are responsible for reducing to a minimum without consulting the interest of students claiming "I do because I think it is The best for you "), the work grants are distributed according to how well you take with x person, etc. Leaders in personal attention? I do not think so. I am aware that the situation is better than in a public but for what it costs, it is not worth at all. If you do not know what to do with your life, it can help you because you give 1000 different things and you can find your vocation, if you know what you want, choose to take your money in a smarter way.
I have started studying a master in this center. They sell you the course as something very practical that will help you find work in the chosen field. I am currently finishing my first module and I am quite disappointed. I arrived eager to learn and practice. The first two or three weeks were very good. Everyone was very cordial and friendly, and the teacher was very motivated. All that changed to the third week after they sent us a survey to give our opinion about the course, the teacher and the school. This teacher is very unmotivated and does not follow his own curriculum. We are a week away from finishing the course and we have not given all the material that is requested to carry out the project, and many classes are based on comparing other web pages with theirs or criticizing people who are dedicated to creating websites. They have also put me a lot of problems in the secretariat. If you are going to enroll in this school, since it is cheaper than many others, keep in mind that if you do not ask for the labor guarantee, they will NOT inform you about it. And if you sign it, you have to do it before you start the classes. Many people did not know that and they have lost it. Also if you are subject to the labor guarantee you have a number of days left, if you spend that day even if you have proof you lose the labor guarantee. I want to think that things will improve with the next module and that there will be other more professional and dedicated teachers. At the moment this is my opinion. If you are thinking about enrolling in CEI, review all the clauses before paying. They will not refund your money under any circumstances.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
