Rennes School of Business vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs NEOMA Business School vs Audencia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 277 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world learning and experienced faculty
- +Diverse and international student and faculty community
- +Welcoming and supportive learning environment
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Professionalizing opportunities and strong alumni network
- +Engaging courses with diverse international classmates and professional professors
- +Vibrant student community and associations
- +Excellent professors, classes, and facilities.
- +Diverse international student community and cultural immersion.
- +Well-structured programs and ample opportunities for professional development and city exploration.
- +Practical, real-world learning and professional connections
- +International and diverse environment
- +High-quality teaching and modern facilities
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Poor English communication from staff and professors is a major frustration.
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues create constant problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and in disrepair.
- -Course content is frequently irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Lack of practical training and outdated facilities.
- -Unresponsive professors and poor management.
- -Irrelevant courses and unqualified teachers.
- -High cost for low value.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Assessing the university's performance reveals a generally positive reception from students. Student life stands out as the strongest area, alongside internationality and professors, all receiving high marks. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Other categories like facilities, location, and value also garnered solid, above-average ratings.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Overall, this university garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. Student life emerges as the strongest area, achieving a notable 4.42. Professors and value are also highly rated at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Facilities represent the weakest point among the surveyed categories, scoring 3.95, though still indicating a generally positive experience.
Regarding its overall assessment, the institution performs best in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Value** (4.16). Professors also receive a high mark (4.03). The weakest area identified is **Accomodation** (3.47), though Facilities also scored relatively lower (3.85). Student Life and Location received solid ratings in the mid-range.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving high marks. It also fares well in **professors** and **internationality**. Conversely, **accommodation** emerges as the weakest area, with the lowest rating. **Facilities** and **value** are rated moderately.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
With ~97% positive feedback, students praise teaching methods, practical learning, global faculty, and strong business ties. A small fraction of reviews noted challenges for international students regarding language and administrative support.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 20 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise the program structure, interesting courses, professionalizing opportunities, and good student vibe. Some mention occasional teaching experience gaps.
With an average rating of 4.19/5, roughly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent classes, professors, and facilities. One negative review expressed disappointment with a lack of practical training and professor engagement.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting a good experience with practical teaching, international environments, and valuable professional connections. A small portion (~7%) expressed concerns about course relevance and cost.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
