Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs EDHEC Business School vs Excelia Business School vs Paris School of Economics

Side-by-side comparison from 234 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Ecole des Ponts Business School (4.60)
Rennes School of Business: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 1/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Paris School of Economics: wins 3/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Management
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
68 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Best programme: Finance
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Best programme: DBA Doctor Of Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.03
4.16
4.32
4.03
4.00
3.93
4.60
Win
Location
4.22
4.54
3.83
4.31
5.00
Win
4.87
4.67
Professors
4.21
4.05
4.33
3.91
4.00
4.53
4.86
Win
Internationality
4.34
4.56
4.44
4.31
4.00
4.87
Win
4.71
Student life
4.37
4.24
4.17
4.26
5.00
Win
4.14
4.60
Value
4.11
4.40
Win
4.06
3.91
4.00
4.13
4.29
Accommodation
3.76
3.94
3.26
3.68
4.00
Win
3.62
3.75
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
  • +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
  • +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
  • +High-quality teaching with industry-experienced professors
  • +Strong corporate network and alumni support for career development
  • +Practical, challenging courses aligning with employer needs
  • +Practical curriculum & professional instructors
  • +International opportunities & diverse environment
  • +Strong alumni network & career preparation
  • +World-class faculty and a vibrant, diverse student community
  • +Exceptional educational experience beyond traditional classrooms
  • +Access to top-tier economics education
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
  • +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
  • +Personal growth and skill development
  • +Career advancement and practical relevance
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
  • -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
  • -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.
  • -Steep tuition fees are a significant financial burden.
  • -Superficial course content and lack of practical value.
  • -Unprofessional training and high tuition costs without adequate support.
  • -Misalignment between program offerings and student expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a major concern.
  • -Course content is irrelevant and poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
  • -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
  • -A lack of administrative support and poor communication causes frustration.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized as being below expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

This university performs exceptionally well in **Internationality** (4.44) and **Professors** (4.33), indicating a strong global outlook and excellent academic staff. **Facilities** (4.32) and **Student Life** (4.17) also receive positive marks. The weakest area is **Accomodation** (3.26), suggesting room for improvement in housing options. **Location** (3.83) is a moderate strength, while **Value** (4.06) is also well-regarded.

This university garners high marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** also received a strong rating. The **Facilities** are well-regarded, while **Professors** and **Value** are rated moderately. The **Accomodation** is the lowest-scoring aspect, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.

This university achieves excellent marks in several key areas, with location and student life standing out at a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and value all receive solid 4-star ratings, indicating a well-rounded experience. While no category falls below a strong 4, the outstanding scores for location and student engagement are the university's clear strengths.

This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.

This institution garners very strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Exceptional scores were awarded for Professors (4.86) and Internationality (4.71). Facilities and Student Life also received high marks (4.6 each). The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.75. Value and Location received solid, though not top-tier, scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 49 reviews, ~98% are positive. Students highlight excellent teaching quality, strong industry connections, practical courses, and valuable career support. Minimal negative feedback questioned tuition costs versus benefits.

~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and networking. A small portion of feedback (~4.4%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and course relevance.

With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The positive feedback highlights a unique educational experience, world-renowned economists, and a diverse, dynamic community. No negative feedback was provided.

The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.

All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5. Students highlight academic excellence, intellectual rigor, a human learning experience, and career advancement. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
58%
39%
31%
0%
67%
57%
4★
54%
29%
51%
50%
100%
20%
43%
3★
5%
11%
8%
15%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
2%
3%
0%
13%
0%
1★
3%
2%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Exemplary institution

The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.

Nothing to show

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close