Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs EDHEC Business School vs Audencia Business School vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 240 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +High-quality teaching with industry-experienced professors
- +Strong corporate network and alumni support for career development
- +Practical, challenging courses aligning with employer needs
- +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
- +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
- +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
- +Practical curriculum & professional instructors
- +International opportunities & diverse environment
- +Strong alumni network & career preparation
- +World-class faculty and a vibrant, diverse student community
- +Exceptional educational experience beyond traditional classrooms
- +Access to top-tier economics education
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Personal growth and skill development
- +Career advancement and practical relevance
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Steep tuition fees are a significant financial burden.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
- -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical value.
- -Unprofessional training and high tuition costs without adequate support.
- -Misalignment between program offerings and student expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a major concern.
- -Course content is irrelevant and poorly delivered.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -A lack of administrative support and poor communication causes frustration.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized as being below expectations.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Internationality** (4.44) and **Professors** (4.33), indicating a strong global outlook and excellent academic staff. **Facilities** (4.32) and **Student Life** (4.17) also receive positive marks. The weakest area is **Accomodation** (3.26), suggesting room for improvement in housing options. **Location** (3.83) is a moderate strength, while **Value** (4.06) is also well-regarded.
This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.
This university garners high marks for its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** also received a strong rating. The **Facilities** are well-regarded, while **Professors** and **Value** are rated moderately. The **Accomodation** is the lowest-scoring aspect, indicating this is the area with the most room for improvement.
This university achieves excellent marks in several key areas, with location and student life standing out at a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, accommodation, internationality, and value all receive solid 4-star ratings, indicating a well-rounded experience. While no category falls below a strong 4, the outstanding scores for location and student engagement are the university's clear strengths.
This institution garners very strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Exceptional scores were awarded for Professors (4.86) and Internationality (4.71). Facilities and Student Life also received high marks (4.6 each). The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.75. Value and Location received solid, though not top-tier, scores.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
With an average rating of 4.27/5 from 49 reviews, ~98% are positive. Students highlight excellent teaching quality, strong industry connections, practical courses, and valuable career support. Minimal negative feedback questioned tuition costs versus benefits.
The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.
~81% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and networking. A small portion of feedback (~4.4%) expresses disappointment with academic depth and course relevance.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The positive feedback highlights a unique educational experience, world-renowned economists, and a diverse, dynamic community. No negative feedback was provided.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5. Students highlight academic excellence, intellectual rigor, a human learning experience, and career advancement. No negative feedback was provided.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
