Université d'Orléans vs emlyon business school vs Excelia Business School vs Polytech Orléans vs SUPINFO Orléans
Side-by-side comparison from 107 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse programs and experienced, friendly professors
- +Affordable tuition and living costs
- +Accessible campus and convenient facilities
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Supportive, approachable professors and strong emphasis on practical, real-world business applications.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering personal growth and unforgettable shared experiences.
- +Opportunities for teamwork, self-discovery, and engaging learning through case studies and projects.
Nothing to show
- +Professionalization and diverse opportunities in computer science
- +Supportive learning environment and personalized pace
- +Mobility and flexible learning formats
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or uninspired.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university shows particular strength in accommodation and internationality, both scoring a high 4.3. Other well-regarded areas include facilities, professors, and location, all at 3.8. Student life represents the weakest area with a score of 3.45, though the overall value remains solid at 3.7.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This university garners an impressive average rating of 4.19. Its strongest areas are **Internationality** (4.57) and **Student Life** (4.34), indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. **Facilities** (4.24) and **Location** (4.27) also score very well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Its strengths lie in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international focus, and exceptional value for money, all scoring a perfect five. The weakest area, with a rating of three, is the performance of its professors. Facilities are also highly rated at a four.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4/5 average rating from 17 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise diverse programs and reasonable fees, experienced and friendly professors, and affordable student living.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
The reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent professors, practical courses, and a strong international environment. Students appreciate teamwork opportunities and the school's ability to foster personal growth and unforgettable experiences.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight ample professional opportunities in computer science and a supportive campus atmosphere. The curriculum effectively fosters professionalization and knowledge diversification.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
I found that the environment is very adaptable and super friendly The Master LAME courses were really interesting and sometimes challenging. However, the language courses promised was not what expected. I hoped for way more especially the french language. Its was definitely not sufficient for someone who is a beginner or intermediate. The other challenge was to get an internship in English..Not easy at all..at all.. Last but not least, the amazing international environment filled with wonderful people from all walks of life.. This definitely made the journey worthwhile.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
