Université Grenoble Alpes - UG vs Rennes School of Business vs emlyon business school vs GEM Alpine Business School vs SKEMA Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 326 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Relevant, up-to-date programs with practical applications
- +State-of-the-art research facilities and conducive study environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty encouraging research
- +Practical and real-world focused learning
- +International and experienced faculty
- +Welcoming and diverse community
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Global faculty insights and international student connections.
- +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with real-world application.
- +Personalized support and rich international opportunities.
- +Practical, career-focused programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive faculty and international student environment
- +Opportunities for hands-on experience and personal development
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and campus infrastructure are disappointing.
- -Course content and overall academic offerings are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Poor English communication and support for international students are prevalent.
- -Lack of adequate facilities and resources are noted.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are commonly criticized.
- -The curriculum or course structure often fails to meet student expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student experience.
- -Poor communication and guidance are significant concerns for students.
- -Teaching faculty needs improvement and a less business-focused approach.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a generally positive university profile. The strongest area is **Professors**, scoring 4.25, suggesting a high quality of instruction. **Facilities** also perform well at 4.1875. The lowest-rated categories are **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, both at 4.03125, indicating potential areas for improvement. Other aspects like Location and Student Life received solid scores around 4.09.
Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with Student Life (4.35) and Internationality (4.32) emerging as particularly strong aspects. Professors (4.22) and Location (4.25) also received high marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, scoring 3.75, while Facilities are rated at 4.03. Value for money is also well-regarded at 4.11.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across most areas. Strengths are evident in **Professors (4.14)**, **Student Life (4.13)**, and **Value (4.10)**, indicating satisfaction with teaching quality, campus engagement, and affordability. **Facilities (4.04)** and **Internationality (4.06)** also receive high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation (3.81)** and **Location (3.86)** are the areas with the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as its strongest points, receiving particularly high scores. Student life and facilities also rate well. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other categories. The university offers a generally good value for its students.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
Most (~97%) students praise the university's research focus, up-to-date programs, and supportive environment. Positive feedback highlights knowledgeable faculty and good facilities, with only minor negative comments on non-academic aspects.
University reviews are largely positive (~97%), highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and professional development opportunities. A small amount of feedback mentions struggles with language barriers for international students.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With an average rating of 4.31/5, ~88% of reviews are positive. Students praise the supportive, innovative, and diverse learning environment, with faculty sharing global insights and courses aligned with tech trends. Some note challenges with group work and admission to certain exchange programs.
Most reviews are positive (~97.3%), praising practical, career-focused courses and knowledgeable instructors. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
Grenoble Alpes University is a very good university from a scientific point of view. The modern laboratories, equipped with various materials, allow for numerous practical projects. Furthermore, the campus, which brings together all the necessary institutions for a better student life, is a major asset. In addition, the university has many professors who are true professionals in research, and who always remain attentive to support students.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Nothing to show
Very good program offering rich training in different sectors of the commerce sector. The establishment has good infrastructure. She offers us good working materials for our projects. The Grenoble campus is not the best in France, but still very good There is a gym, classes, well equipped, amphitheatres, quite large and a beautiful cafeteria, it's not great luxury, but it has everything you need In our program, especially my year, we are lucky to have very good teachers who listen and who train us in an excellent way. This school nevertheless lacks international students compared to the top 5 of École de France, a business
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
Nothing to show
