Centrale Supelec vs EDHEC Business School vs EPF Graduate School of Engineering - EPF vs ESTACA Engineering School vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic rigor and advanced, up-to-date courses
- +High career prospects and strong earning potential
- +Transformative mindset shift and supportive mentorship
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Diverse specializations and flexible program to find vocation
- +International opportunities and engaging student life
- +Practical learning through projects and supportive professors
- +Hands-on learning and innovative projects
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Strong aerospace focus with practical application.
- +Vibrant student life and numerous associations.
- +Good balance of theory and practice.
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant drawbacks.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
- -Limited career support and unclear program outcomes are a concern.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with Student Life receiving a perfect score. Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality are also highly rated. The university's Value and Professors are well-regarded, while Location presents the weakest area, scoring noticeably lower than other aspects.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Across surveyed categories, the institution demonstrates a strong profile. Student Life stands out as the highest-rated aspect, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, Accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value are all positive and generally align with each other, painting a picture of a well-rounded university experience.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a perfect 5 and a high 4.5 respectively. The **Internationality** also stands out with a 4.5 rating. Areas that could see improvement include **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, each receiving a 3.5, suggesting these aspects are adequate but not exceptional. **Professors** are rated well at 4, indicating a positive academic experience.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution receives its highest accolades for student life and facilities, both scoring well above average. Conversely, the location emerges as a significant concern, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like professors, accommodation, and value present a more moderate, positive picture, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback indicating high satisfaction. Students highlight excellent, comprehensive training with strong career prospects and high starting salaries. An international campus and supportive environment are also frequently praised.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight diverse majors, international opportunities, and engaging project-based learning as key strengths.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are highly positive (~100%). Students praise hands-on learning, innovative projects, and knowledgeable professors. Opportunities in specialized sectors like automotive are also highlighted.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Students praise extensive practical aerospace training and vibrant student life with numerous associations. The university's isolated location is a recurring concern, though positive feedback suggests it doesn't overshadow the strong sense of community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
I'm thrilled to share my experience at ESTACA Engineering School, where I've grown both academically and personally. The school's strong focus on hands-on learning and innovative projects has equipped me with the skills and confidence to excel in my field. The professors are approachable, knowledgeable, and passionate about teaching, making complex concepts accessible and engaging. The campus life is vibrant, with numerous extracurricular activities and clubs that foster a sense of community and teamwork. What stood out to me was the school's emphasis on real-world applications and industry partnerships, which have provided me with valuable internship opportunities and a network of professionals in my field. If you're looking for a well-rounded education that prepares you for the challenges of the engineering world, ESTACA is an excellent choice. I'm grateful for the experience and proud to be a part of the ESTACA community.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
