IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs EPITECH - EPITECH vs EDHEC Business School vs Ecole de Management IFAG
Side-by-side comparison from 464 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +High-quality, balanced training with relevant topics.
- +Strong company network for work-study and employment.
- +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
- +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
- +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
Nothing to show
- +Expert industry professionals and practical industry exposure
- +Challenging but valuable life sciences education
Nothing to show
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on profit over student well-being and quality of education.
- -Lack of soft skills oriented learning, despite a strong technical environment.
- -High cost of education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
Nothing to show
- -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in its student life and internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded with a top rating. Facilities and location are strong points, both at 4.5. Value for money is rated well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5.
The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its facilities, professors, and internationality, all receiving perfect scores. Student life offers a moderate experience, while its value proposition is highly rated. However, significant drawbacks are evident in its location and accommodation, both of which received zero ratings, indicating these are areas of considerable concern.
Nothing to show
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average. ~40% of feedback is negative, citing high cost and lack of student well-being support. Positive feedback highlights excellent training and good employment networks.
With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's strong life sciences program and industry-experienced professionals. The curriculum is highlighted as valuable, though one review notes it can be stressful.
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
