IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs ILERI School of International Relations
Side-by-side comparison from 443 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Supportive professors and practical, relevant coursework
- +Strong international environment and diverse student community
- +Numerous opportunities for personal growth and engagement
- +Small class sizes and close-knit learning environment.
- +Practical, real-world teaching methods with professional exposure.
- +Vibrant student life and international, open-minded environment.
- +Broad international focus and cross-cultural learning
- +Strong professional development and recognized technical training
- +Opportunities for networking and future connections
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Job advancement and market-relevant skills
- +High-quality faculty and a sense of community
- +Strong research methods and technological focus
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication from staff and administration.
- -Lack of adequate support and resources.
- -Empty and irrelevant courses with unqualified teachers.
- -High tuition fees for poor value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of responsiveness and clear communication from staff is a major complaint.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is often irrelevant and poorly delivered.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
The university demonstrates exceptional strength in **Internationality**, achieving a score of 4.6. Student Life also garners high marks, rating at 4.37. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.8. Other areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value, all receive positive ratings, generally falling between 4.1 and 4.3.
With strong performance in **Location** and **Student Life** scoring an impressive 4.27, this institution offers a vibrant environment. **Professors** also received a solid rating of 4.06. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area with a rating of 3.31, indicating room for improvement in student housing facilities. Other aspects like Facilities and Value fall within a moderate range.
Overall, the university garners positive ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** standing out as exceptional strengths. Professors and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest area, with ratings for Facilities and Location also being moderate. The university presents a well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in student experience and perceived worth.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its faculty, international environment, and outstanding facilities and location, all receiving a perfect or near-perfect score. Student life also ranks highly, contributing to a positive overall experience. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating compared to other aspects of the university. The overall value is rated very favorably.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
With a 4.36 average rating from 25 reviews, ~100% are positive. Students highlight engaging courses, supportive teachers, and a strong international environment. Some administrative processes could be improved.
~75% of 16 reviews are positive, highlighting a close-knit learning environment, vibrant student life, practical teaching methods, and international exposure. One review (~6%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching quality.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~67% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent programs, a valuable international focus, and professional development opportunities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the program for providing valuable job skills and career advancement. They also highlight competent professors and interesting events.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
