IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 538 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Vibrant student life and positive campus experience
- +International environment and engaging professors
- +Strong academic programs and modern facilities
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
- +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
- +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
- +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
- +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +International and diverse community
- +Interactive and engaging learning approach
- +Focus on personal growth and development
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Concerns exist regarding the academic quality and professor engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
- -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
- -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of clarity or support regarding curriculum and academic expectations is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Internationality and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Location also scores highly. Conversely, Accommodations represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.92. Facilities and Professors are rated moderately well, while Value stands out as a strong performer at 4.31.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.
Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
Evaluations reveal a strong academic offering, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Location** also scores exceptionally well at 4.83. The university demonstrates good performance in **Student Life** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.56), with **Value** also rated favorably at 4.56. **Facilities** are rated at 4.45, and **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score at 4.29.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 and 234 positive reviews (approximately 91%), students highly recommend the university for its engaging programs, international environment, and vibrant student life. Very limited negative feedback (approximately 0.8%) exists.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
With an average rating of 4.66/5 from 32 reviews, students praise Forward College's enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching methods. Personal and academic growth are frequently highlighted.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
