IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Audencia Business School vs IPAG Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 594 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 3/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Audencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
IPAG Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Master in Management
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Category ratings
Facilities
4.16
4.23
4.33
Win
4.05
3.45
4.02
3.93
Location
4.42
4.32
3.85
4.06
4.73
4.30
4.87
Win
Professors
4.29
4.37
4.32
4.14
3.82
3.91
4.53
Win
Internationality
4.56
4.43
4.45
4.43
3.91
4.30
4.87
Win
Student life
4.44
Win
4.25
4.22
4.05
3.91
4.25
4.14
Value
4.32
Win
4.09
4.06
4.10
3.82
3.91
4.13
Accommodation
3.93
Win
3.70
3.28
3.60
3.27
3.66
3.62
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Vibrant student life and positive campus experience
  • +International environment and engaging professors
  • +Strong academic programs and modern facilities
  • +Practical skills and real-world business application
  • +International environment and diverse experiences
  • +Career development and professional growth
  • +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
  • +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
  • +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
  • +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
  • +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
  • +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty, focused on student well-being and professional development.
  • +Program relevance to career goals, practical experience, and adaptability to student feedback.
  • +Welcoming and inclusive environment, fostering a sense of community and individual value.
  • +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
  • +International exposure and multicultural environment.
  • +High-quality teaching and good course content.
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
Cons
  • -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Concerns exist regarding the academic quality and professor engagement.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Poor communication and guidance
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
  • -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
  • -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
  • -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
  • -Unprofessional coordination and administrative issues.
  • -Low academic quality and unfulfilled course offerings.
  • -Poor student support and delayed essential documentation.
  • -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
  • -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
  • -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
  • -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
Rating summary
What students say

Internationality and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Location also scores highly. Conversely, Accommodations represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.92. Facilities and Professors are rated moderately well, while Value stands out as a strong performer at 4.31.

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.

The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.

This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.

An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a distinct pattern, with **Location** standing out as the strongest area, scoring a near-perfect 4.7. Areas such as **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received strong marks, both at 3.87. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3.25, closely followed by **Facilities** at 3.44. Professors and Value are rated moderately well.

Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.

This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.38/5 and 234 positive reviews (approximately 91%), students highly recommend the university for its engaging programs, international environment, and vibrant student life. Very limited negative feedback (approximately 0.8%) exists.

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.

The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.

~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting good programs, attentive staff, and a welcoming environment. A small portion (~18%) mentions issues with course delivery, coordination, and administrative support.

With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.

The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.

Rating distribution
5★
48%
50%
38%
29%
18%
31%
67%
4★
43%
41%
52%
67%
64%
51%
20%
3★
8%
7%
8%
0%
0%
13%
0%
2★
0%
1%
2%
5%
9%
3%
13%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
9%
1%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Focus on multicultural business management

I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.

Bachelor in business administration

The people that are supposed to help you at IPAG are not going to do it, and if they do it would take as long as they want it to take, for example, I tried to renew my visa with the university because they told me like that was easier and it took 8 months in the process, my visa got expired, I almost got kicked out of the country and I ended up doing the process myself. Besides this, I just graduated this year on august and as well as all my classmates we have been trying to get our certificates and our grades in order to start to work or to continue our postgraduate studies but they just don't want to give us all this. IPAG is not a university with organization and neither who cares about their students, just about your money. If you are foreign you will get to know people from all the world and you will have a good experience but you can do this also at any other university in europe and you would be way more taken in count.

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close