IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs HEC Paris vs ONCAMPUS Global
Side-by-side comparison from 557 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Vibrant student life and positive campus experience
- +International environment and engaging professors
- +Strong academic programs and modern facilities
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for professional development and real-world experience
- +Strong academic programs and supportive resources
- +Practical skills and real-world business application
- +International environment and diverse experiences
- +Career development and professional growth
- +Strong academic programs and expert faculty
- +Excellent personal and professional growth opportunities
- +Supportive and engaging community and peers
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Transformative personal and professional growth
- +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Concerns exist regarding the academic quality and professor engagement.
- -Lack of practical value in coursework and insufficient learning.
- -Frustrating and unfair grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program management.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and guidance
- -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
- -Administrative and organizational inefficiencies are a major problem.
- -Teaching quality is perceived as poor, with a lack of diverse perspectives.
- -Career prospects and the school's reputation outside of France are concerns.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
Internationality and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Location also scores highly. Conversely, Accommodations represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.92. Facilities and Professors are rated moderately well, while Value stands out as a strong performer at 4.31.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in both **Internationality** (4.59) and **Location** (4.57), indicating excellent global engagement and a desirable setting. **Value** for money is also highly rated (4.41). The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring the lowest at 3.94, though other aspects like Student Life (4.25) and Facilities (4.15) remain solid. Professors also receive a respectable rating of 4.06.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.
The university garners strong ratings across several aspects, with **Internationality** being its standout achievement at 4.41. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, both scoring 4.24. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, rated at 3.76. Facilities and accommodation are generally well-regarded, while professors also maintain a solid score.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 and 234 positive reviews (approximately 91%), students highly recommend the university for its engaging programs, international environment, and vibrant student life. Very limited negative feedback (approximately 0.8%) exists.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), praising academic rigor, practical application, and international diversity. A small percentage (~2%) expressed disappointment with course content and grading fairness.
With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent learning environments, professors, and community. A small percentage (~8.8%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiencies and concerns about curriculum organization.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Very international and interesting place to be and opens a lot of opportunities, however the administration is very french and facilities are subpar (gym, classrooms) meaning the academic affairs is pretty much useless and lastly we are graded on a curve which can create a toxic environment because of the competition. With that being said the pros outweighs the cons by far.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
