IÉSEG School of Management vs Sciences Po vs Université de Poitiers vs Clermont School of Business vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 407 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum with practical applications
- +Networking opportunities and vibrant student life
- +Prestigious institution with accomplished faculty
- +Approachable, invested, and knowledgeable faculty
- +Stimulating and supportive academic environment
- +Clean, comfortable, and well-maintained facilities
- +Practical industry application and real-world expertise from professors.
- +Diverse, international student community fostering multicultural experiences.
- +Personalized academic journey with flexible course options.
- +Supportive, approachable professors and strong emphasis on practical, real-world business applications.
- +Diverse, international environment fostering personal growth and unforgettable shared experiences.
- +Opportunities for teamwork, self-discovery, and engaging learning through case studies and projects.
- +Strong aerospace focus with practical application.
- +Vibrant student life and numerous associations.
- +Good balance of theory and practice.
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and academic methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Poor quality of teaching and relevance to career preparation.
- -Lack of substantial learning and qualified speakers.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
Internationality and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, receiving exceptional ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Professors, student life, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though facilities fall in the middle ground.
This institution shows a generally positive reception across its evaluated aspects. Student life stands out as a particular strength, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, location and value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded, with professors and internationality performing strongly.
This university garners strong evaluations across multiple aspects. Its internationality stands out as a particular strength, receiving the highest rating. Student life and professors are also highly regarded. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which, while still rated positively, falls below the university's other strong categories.
This university garners an impressive average rating of 4.19. Its strongest areas are **Internationality** (4.57) and **Student Life** (4.34), indicating a vibrant and globally connected campus environment. **Facilities** (4.24) and **Location** (4.27) also score very well. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.74, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution receives its highest accolades for student life and facilities, both scoring well above average. Conversely, the location emerges as a significant concern, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like professors, accommodation, and value present a more moderate, positive picture, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary education, strong academics, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about teaching methods and academic staff preparation.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 16 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise approachable and invested teachers, quality lessons, and a clean, comfortable study environment.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (around 98%), with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the high-quality teaching, professors' real-world expertise, and the diverse, international student community. One negative review cited a lack of job-ready skills and unqualified speakers.
The reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent professors, practical courses, and a strong international environment. Students appreciate teamwork opportunities and the school's ability to foster personal growth and unforgettable experiences.
Students praise extensive practical aerospace training and vibrant student life with numerous associations. The university's isolated location is a recurring concern, though positive feedback suggests it doesn't overshadow the strong sense of community.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
As a student, I’ve been impressed by the professionalism and expertise of the professors, who bring real-world experience into the classroom, making learning both relevant and practical. The student body is equally diverse, with classmates from all over the world, which creates a rich, multicultural environment that enhances the overall experience. The administration also supports this international mix, ensuring that students from different countries feel welcomed and well-supported throughout their studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
