IÉSEG School of Management vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management vs ESG Ecoles de Commerce vs Sciences Po Aix
Side-by-side comparison from 288 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +High-quality education with specialized pathways and practical application
- +Supportive community and vibrant campus life with numerous activities
- +Strong industry connections and opportunities for real-world experience
- +Practical, career-oriented education with real-life projects
- +Attentive and available staff and faculty
- +Diverse program options for professional development
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Poor quality of teaching and irrelevant course content.
- -Significant organizational and administrative problems.
- -High cost with little perceived value.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources were frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality did not meet expectations.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Overall, this institution receives a balanced set of ratings. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.16) and **Student Life** (4.11), indicating positive student experiences in these regards. **Accomodation**, however, presents the weakest point at 3.37. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Internationality fall within a mid-to-high range, suggesting generally satisfactory performance across these aspects.
Professors and location stand out as exceptional strengths, receiving high marks. Student life, however, emerges as the weakest area with a noticeably lower rating. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are rated solidly in the mid-range, contributing to an overall balanced profile with a strong emphasis on academic quality. The university also scores well for its value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. Just ~7.4% of feedback is negative, citing unprepared professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 4/5, most reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented education and a modern campus with diverse activities. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
