University of Ghana - UG vs Egerton University vs University of Cumbria vs ICD Business School vs Bolgatanga Technical University - BOLGATU
Side-by-side comparison from 312 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
- +Strong academic programmes and passionate, supportive lecturers.
- +Conducive environment for growth and vibrant campus community.
- +Practical learning opportunities and research exposure.
- +Practical, career-focused programs and employability emphasis
- +Supportive and motivating teaching staff
- +Enjoyable study environment and facilities
- +Engaging learning environment and quality education
- +Supportive and accessible staff and professors
- +Valuable internship and growth opportunities
Nothing to show
- +High-quality education and state-of-the-art facilities
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Positive and ambitious learning environment
Nothing to show
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and limited individual attention are prevalent.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
Academic and campus life stand out in this university's evaluations. Professors received an impressive 4.49, followed closely by student life at 4.35 and value at 4.27. Conversely, internationality presented the lowest score at 3.96, suggesting an area where further development might be beneficial. Overall, the institution shows a robust performance in key areas important to student experience and education.
With a standout score for professors, this institution clearly excels in academic instruction. Conversely, facilities present the lowest-rated aspect. Other areas like location and accommodation are well-regarded, suggesting a generally positive student experience, though student life scores are moderate. Internationality and value also receive favorable marks.
This institution garners excellent marks across a broad spectrum of evaluations. Professors receive perfect scores, reflecting exceptional teaching quality. Facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Student life, while still strong at 4, is the comparatively lowest-rated area. Overall, the university presents a very positive and well-rounded picture for prospective students.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities**, achieving a high 4.75, and strong commendations for **Professors** and **Student Life** at 4.5. While **Location** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.75. Overall, the **Value** is rated a solid 4.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
With ~91% positive feedback, students praise the high-quality education, supportive lecturers, and conducive environment for academic and personal growth. Some mention fee issues.
Most reviews are highly positive, rating the university 4.5/5. Students praise practical, career-focused programs, supportive staff, and appealing campuses. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight abundant growth opportunities, quality education, and exceptional teaching methods. They also appreciate the welcoming atmosphere, accessibility of staff, and valuable internship experiences.
Nothing to show
All 4 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise high-quality technology, state-of-the-art infrastructure, and cooperative, informative faculty. The learning environment is described as positive and ambitious, with a unique, conceptual study pattern.
Nothing to show
The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.
I like the university offers quality holistics world class training that meets the 21st needs. The programmes offered are competitve embedding the technologies, research, innovation and industrial linkages/collaborations
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
