University of Ghana - UG vs Central University vs University of Professional Studies Accra - UPSA vs Accra Technical University vs University of Development Studies - UDS
Side-by-side comparison from 342 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
- +Practical, relevant programmes with industry insights
- +Approachable, friendly, and dedicated lecturers
- +Supportive, quiet, and enabling learning environment
- +Academic quality and professional development
- +Supportive staff and student relationships
- +Structured curriculum and resources
- +Strong focus on practical learning and job market preparation
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers
- +Encourages leadership and professional growth
- +Practical, field-based learning in communities
- +Modern facilities and knowledgeable professors
- +Moderate fees
- +Supportive and effective lecturers
- +Good facilities
- +Engaging and effective teaching methods
- +Supportive and accessible instructors
- +Excellent career development support
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology create a poor learning environment.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Students often express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring issue.
- -The curriculum is often inflexible and irrelevant to current needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and limited technology are concerns.
- -The class system is considered insufficient.
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
Overall, this university presents a strong profile. Its highest-rated area is **Internationality** at 4.375, demonstrating a significant global presence. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** emerge as the weakest points, both scoring 3.375. **Location** and **Student Life** are well-regarded, tied at 3.875, while **Value** sits at a solid 3.75.
With an impressive location rating, this institution excels in student life and value. However, accommodation appears to be the lowest-scoring area. Facilities and professors also received strong marks, while internationality fell in the mid-range.
A review of university ratings reveals a strong performance in value and professor quality, with scores of 4.41 and 4.36 respectively. Student life and internationality also received high marks, both at 3.95. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3.24, followed by facilities at 3.67. The location received a respectable 3.82 rating.
Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance with notable strengths in Value, Professors, and Accomodation, all scoring an average of 4 or higher. Student Life, Location, and Internationality also received solid ratings, hovering around 3.7. The facilities, while adequate, represent the lowest-scoring area at 3.57, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution shines with an exceptional rating for its professors, indicating a high quality of instruction. Facilities and student life also receive strong scores, suggesting a supportive and engaging environment. Conversely, the university's location presents a notable weakness, receiving a low score. Accommodation and internationality are rated moderately, offering a middle ground. Overall, the value proposition appears positive, as reflected in its solid rating.
This institution excels in academics and social engagement, with particularly strong ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life**. Conversely, its weakest areas are **Location** and **Accomodation**, both receiving the lowest possible scores. Facilities and overall value are rated moderately. Internationality is a mid-range strength, indicating a solid but not outstanding global presence.
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
With a 4.1/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~70% of feedback is positive. Students praise a blend of theory and practice in programs, approachable lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.
University of Professional Studies reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~87%), praising academic discipline, research, and student engagement. Students highlight professional development, excellent lecturers, and good student-teacher relationships. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 22 reviews, approximately 91% highlight hands-on learning and supportive lecturers. A few mention limited practical facilities or a desire for more programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
All seven reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.43/5. Students highlight impactful community engagement and practical field-based learning experiences. Modern facilities, knowledgeable professors, and moderate fees are also mentioned.
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests excellent lecturers and good facilities, though customer service could be improved.
The single review (100% negative) suggests administrative issues despite brilliant teachers and good courses. The student experienced a slightly poor administration system.
The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.
My honest opinion about central university I will say conducive atmosphere for studying. What I didn’t like I will say is lecturers do not pay much attention to students' reports (exams papers and end of semester results ), you will have to go to hell and back before you will finally get what has to be worked on done. I will suggest they pay more attention to students' needs. In all my stay at Central University was a good one.
UPSA is a beautiful school which nurtures and shape you for the future. I was there from 2015 to 2019 and I do not regret my decision to enroll there. Even though the campus wasn't spacious enough, building structures were strategically positioned creating free and easy movement. They have a flat of four storeys dedicated for a library with a vast array of books - well labelled according to discipline. The best part is, the library operated 24 hours a day. When it comes to teaching and learning, the university boasts of highly qualified lecturers and spacious lecture halls. In terms of security on campus, they are top notch. The campus is always lit with security men patrolling the campus. What I didn't like when I was there is, even though I was an evening student, during exams they combined both regular students and evening student and I struggled because I worked while schooling.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
