University of Ghana - UG vs Central University vs Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration - GIMPA vs Lancaster University Ghana vs Presbyterian University College

Side-by-side comparison from 288 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Valley View University - Vvu (4.60)
University of Ghana - UG: wins 0/5 categories
Central University: wins 0/5 categories
Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration - GIMPA: wins 1/5 categories
Lancaster University Ghana: wins 1/5 categories
Presbyterian University College: wins 1/5 categories
Valley View University - Vvu: wins 2/5 categories
Knutsford University College - KNUTSFORD: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.38
4.11
3.00
3.88
4.11
4.00
Location
4.32
3.88
4.56
Win
1.50
3.88
4.38
4.50
Professors
4.25
4.00
4.33
4.50
4.13
4.33
4.50
Internationality
4.08
4.38
4.22
5.00
Win
3.63
4.22
3.50
Student life
4.29
3.88
4.25
3.00
4.38
Win
4.22
3.00
Value
4.22
3.75
4.33
3.50
4.25
4.67
Win
3.50
Accommodation
3.48
3.38
3.67
2.00
3.75
4.22
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Practical, relevant programmes with industry insights
  • +Approachable, friendly, and dedicated lecturers
  • +Supportive, quiet, and enabling learning environment
  • +Supportive and engaging faculty
  • +Practical, career-focused education
  • +Positive and conducive learning environment
  • +Structured, well-prepared course delivery with ample resources
  • +Supportive environment fostering personal growth and leadership opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs with practical skills integration
  • +Supportive and welcoming community fostering personal growth
  • +Moderate fees and Christian values emphasizing integrity
  • +Quality teaching and accessible, professional lecturers
  • +Good learning environment with adequate resources and facilities
  • +Supportive community and academic opportunities
  • +Friendly and good lecturers
  • +Quality academic programs and infrastructure
  • +Well-rounded course outlines and great learning environment
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Course content lacks relevance and practical application.
  • -administrative & management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of relevant curriculum
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Unclear communication and a lack of support are common complaints.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and a lack of engagement from instructors are highly disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication leads to confusion and frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

Overall, this university presents a strong profile. Its highest-rated area is **Internationality** at 4.375, demonstrating a significant global presence. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** emerge as the weakest points, both scoring 3.375. **Location** and **Student Life** are well-regarded, tied at 3.875, while **Value** sits at a solid 3.75.

This institution garners strong marks across several key areas. Location stands out as its strongest attribute, alongside high ratings for professors and value. Student life and internationality also receive positive evaluations. However, the weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a comparatively lower score, indicating potential room for improvement in student housing.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Internationality**, receiving a perfect score, and boasts excellent **Professors** at 4.5. Conversely, its **Location** is a notable weakness, scoring only 1.5, with **Accomodation** also rated low at 2. Areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall in the middle range, indicating a mixed overall experience.

An overview of recent university ratings reveals a generally positive picture, with Student Life achieving the highest score at 4.375. Professors also received strong marks (4.125), followed closely by Value (4.25). Conversely, Internationality stands out as the area with the lowest rating (3.625), and Accomodation also scored moderately lower than other aspects at 3.75. Facilities and Location fall within a similar, mid-range bracket.

Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects. Its strongest area is **Value**, receiving a rating of 4.67. **Professors** and **Location** also stand out with high scores of 4.33 and 4.38 respectively. The university's **Facilities** are its weakest area, with a rating of 4.11, though this is still a solid score. Student life, accommodation, and internationality are all rated similarly well at 4.22.

Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Facilities** also score well with 4 stars. Conversely, areas such as **student life** and **accommodation** are rated lower at 3 stars, indicating potential for improvement. The university presents a middle-ground performance in **internationality** and **value**, each earning 3.5 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

With a 4.1/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~70% of feedback is positive. Students praise a blend of theory and practice in programs, approachable lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~90%), with students praising academic quality and preparedness for careers. A small amount of feedback (~0%) noted outdated teaching materials and facilities.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, students highly praise the structured Law program, including well-prepared slides and practical exercises. Personal growth and a supportive, family-like community are also highlighted positively.

University reviews show strong positive sentiment (~88%), with students highlighting academic quality, personal growth, and a welcoming community. Lecturers and a supportive environment are frequently praised. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 4.56/5 average rating from 9 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight good professors, valuable education, and supportive learning environments. Some mention bureaucratic processes or compulsory hostel/feeding as minor drawbacks.

With an average rating of 4/5, students praise friendly lecturers and quality academic programs. Essential infrastructure like libraries and ICT labs are highlighted positively.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
40%
50%
50%
38%
56%
0%
4★
47%
30%
40%
50%
50%
44%
100%
3★
11%
30%
10%
0%
13%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

My honest opinion

My honest opinion about central university I will say conducive atmosphere for studying. What I didn’t like I will say is lecturers do not pay much attention to students' reports (exams papers and end of semester results ), you will have to go to hell and back before you will finally get what has to be worked on done. I will suggest they pay more attention to students' needs. In all my stay at Central University was a good one.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close