University of Ghana - UG vs Ashesi University College - AUC vs Lancaster University Ghana vs University of Media Arts and Communications - Unimac vs Regional Maritime University

Side-by-side comparison from 310 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Ghana - UG: wins 1/7 categories
Ashesi University College - AUC: wins 5/7 categories
Lancaster University Ghana: wins 1/7 categories
University of Media Arts and Communications - Unimac : wins 0/7 categories
Regional Maritime University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Bachelor of Communication Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.57
Win
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.32
Win
3.67
1.50
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.25
4.63
Win
4.50
4.40
Not rated
Internationality
4.08
4.63
5.00
Win
2.60
Not rated
Student life
4.29
4.38
Win
3.00
3.60
Not rated
Value
4.22
4.69
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.48
4.30
Win
2.00
1.80
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
  • +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
  • +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
  • +Values-driven community and support systems
  • +Focus on leadership, ethics, and real-world preparedness
  • +Quality education with personalized attention
  • +Structured, well-prepared course delivery with ample resources
  • +Supportive environment fostering personal growth and leadership opportunities
  • +Practical skills integrated with theory
  • +Real-world exposure and hands-on experience
  • +Career path development and professional skill improvement

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
  • -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -administrative & management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of relevant curriculum
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.

This institution garners strong commendations in several key areas. Notably, its Professors, Internationality, and Value received the highest scores, suggesting excellent academic staff, a global outlook, and good return on investment. Facilities and Student Life also score highly, indicating a well-equipped campus and vibrant community. Conversely, Location presents the weakest area, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects. Accommodations are rated positively, though not as exceptionally as the top-scoring categories.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Internationality**, receiving a perfect score, and boasts excellent **Professors** at 4.5. Conversely, its **Location** is a notable weakness, scoring only 1.5, with **Accomodation** also rated low at 2. Areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall in the middle range, indicating a mixed overall experience.

An analysis of university ratings reveals a mixed performance. The institution excels in its **Professors (4.4)** and **Value (4)**, indicating strong academic quality and affordability. Conversely, **Accomodation (1.8)** presents a significant weakness, alongside a lower score for **Internationality (2.6)**. Other areas like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a moderate range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of 57 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight strong community, leadership focus, and academic quality. No negative reviews were recorded.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, students highly praise the structured Law program, including well-prepared slides and practical exercises. Personal growth and a supportive, family-like community are also highlighted positively.

Most feedback is positive (~80%), highlighting strong career path development and a blend of theoretical and practical learning. A small portion (~20%) of reviews noted limited on-campus practical opportunities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
52%
50%
0%
0%
4★
47%
48%
50%
80%
0%
3★
11%
2%
0%
20%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Educative

The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close