Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs Fluminense Federal University - UFF vs Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro vs Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ: wins 0/4 categories
Fluminense Federal University - UFF: wins 1/4 categories
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro: wins 1/4 categories
Augusto Motta University Centre - UNSUAM: wins 1/4 categories
Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Urbanism
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: Agriculture
Best programme: Criminology and Law
Best programme: Bachelor in ICT
Category ratings
Facilities
3.06
3.25
4.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
3.44
4.00
4.80
Win
4.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
Professors
4.33
4.75
4.40
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.22
3.50
3.30
4.00
5.00
Win
2.00
3.00
Student life
3.41
3.50
4.00
4.00
4.50
4.00
4.50
Value
4.56
4.00
4.70
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
2.88
3.25
2.90
3.00
3.00
Not rated
3.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality faculty and learning opportunities
  • +Diverse extracurricular and research options
  • +Strong industry connections and career preparation
  • +Excellent and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Strong academic and career opportunities
  • +Great infrastructure and accessible campus
  • +High-quality, supportive professors with advanced credentials
  • +Comprehensive, up-to-date curriculum and diverse course offerings
  • +Strong academic focus and research promotion
  • +Highly qualified faculty and diverse educational techniques
  • +Freedom to explore various areas of knowledge
  • +Excellent teaching and professor support
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Wide course variety
  • +Excellent teaching and well-structured programs.
  • +Abundant student amenities and resources like the library.
  • +Supportive environment and helpful staff.
  • +Practical and accessible learning with helpful professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment fostering friendships
  • +Good cost-benefit value and local convenience
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a significant concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of adequate support and engagement from instructors is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
  • -administrative and management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of adequate resources and support
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of updated curriculum and resources is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates significant strengths in Value, with a near-perfect rating. Professors and Internationality also received commendably high scores. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Facilities and Student Life received moderate ratings.

Professorial expertise stands out significantly, with an impressive 4.75 rating. Location and student life are also well-regarded, both receiving a 4 and 3.5 respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are areas with the lowest scores, averaging 3.25. The university demonstrates a solid overall value at 4.

This institution garners praise for its **location**, which received a near-perfect score of 4.8, and for its **value** at 4.7, alongside strong marks for **professors** (4.4). Student life and facilities are rated solidly at 4. However, **accommodation** presents a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 2.9, and **internationality** also falls short with a rating of 3.3.

Overall, the university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. It particularly excels in the **Professors** category, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** all received strong marks at 4 out of 5. The lowest rating was for **Accomodation** at 3, indicating this area might benefit from further development. The **Value** proposition is also rated positively at 4.

This university scores exceptionally well in areas such as professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect or near-perfect marks. Value for money is also a standout strength. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, while facilities and location fall in the mid-range. Overall, it offers a highly regarded academic and social experience.

This university garners top marks for its facilities, professors, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. Student life and location are also considered strong points, rated at a solid 4. However, the university struggles significantly in the accommodation category, scoring a zero, and its internationality is rated low at 2.

The university receives commendations for its excellent facilities, dedicated professors, and appealing location and student life, all scoring highly. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, with lower scores. The overall value is rated moderately, suggesting room for enhancement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most (95%) of reviews are positive, praising rich content, research focus, and numerous opportunities. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods.

With a 4.25 average rating from 4 reviews, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent, knowledgeable teachers and good infrastructure, with recognition for academic competence. Some note facilities, like bathrooms, need maintenance and improved ventilation in rooms.

With a 4.3/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors, strong academic foundations, up-to-date curricula, and research opportunities. They also appreciate supportive environments and diverse learning experiences.

Based on one review, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights qualified faculty and a conducive campus environment. Infrastructure and scholarship incentives were noted for improvement.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students praise the university's great teachers, diverse courses, and supportive professors. The calm, safe environment and inclusive atmosphere are also highlighted, with no negative feedback recorded.

This university has a single positive review, contributing to a perfect 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights great teachers, ample student amenities, and a well-structured program with diverse learning activities. A well-stocked library and helpful librarians were also praised.

All (100%) reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight excellent quality, great support, and a welcoming environment. They found their studies valuable and a good cost-benefit option.

Rating distribution
5★
37%
25%
40%
0%
50%
100%
100%
4★
53%
75%
50%
100%
50%
0%
0%
3★
11%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close