ESIC Business & Marketing School vs EBES Business School vs Universidad de Sevilla vs Universidad Internacional de Andalucía vs Universidad Loyola Andalucía
Side-by-side comparison from 183 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +practical, project-based learning with real companies
- +excellent teaching quality from industry professionals
- +strong academic and personal support from staff
- +Student-centric focus and supportive environment
- +Positive overall experience and successful outcomes
- +Prestigious academic reputation and excellent teachers
- +Engaging city environment and diverse programs
- +Rigorous programs fostering professional development
Nothing to show
- +Small class sizes and interactive professors
- +Interesting and modern curriculum with practical applications
- +Flexible scheduling and supportive campus environment
- +Effective career placement and industry connections
- +Well-structured, English-taught master's programs
- +Experienced instructors and relevant, current case studies.
- +Exposure to diverse student backgrounds and networking opportunities.
- +Practical, innovative learning fostering a broader industry perspective.
- -Inadequate administrative and management support, particularly for international students.
- -Misleading information regarding course delivery and lack of proper orientation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of teaching vocation and empathy from professors.
- -Poor infrastructure and outdated facilities.
- -Inconvenient campus location with limited transportation.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a problem.
- -A lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are prevalent complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are disappointing.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are major concerns.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Facilities** emerging as its strongest asset at 4.1. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 3.8. Areas rated lower include **Internationality** at 3.5 and **Accomodation** and **Value**, both at 3.6, representing opportunities for improvement. Student life and location also fall within a solid, though not outstanding, range.
This institution demonstrates a clear dichotomy in its offerings, excelling in core academic and experiential aspects while facing significant challenges elsewhere. Professors, location, student life, and overall value all receive top marks, indicating a highly positive experience in these areas. However, the complete absence of ratings for facilities and accommodation suggests these are areas requiring substantial improvement. Internationality is also a strong, though not perfect, point.
Reviewing the provided ratings reveals a university with a generally positive reception. Student Life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest score. Conversely, Professors received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like Location, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value also performed well, maintaining solid scores. Facilities also garnered a favorable rating.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Professors are highly rated at 4.67, with student life, internationality, and value also scoring well at 4.33. The university also fares well in facilities and location, both rated at 4. However, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, receiving a low rating of 2.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Student experience is also highly regarded, with **Professors**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** all earning a solid 4 out of 5. While no areas were rated poorly, the overall profile highlights excellent infrastructure and a well-rounded offering for students.
Exceptional scores mark this university's performance, with Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all receiving outstanding ratings of 4.83. Value for money stands out as a perfect 5. The only area slightly below the near-perfect average is Internationality, which scores a strong 4.67.
With an average rating of 4.11/5 from 54 reviews, ~85% are positive, highlighting complete degrees, practical projects with companies, and quality teaching. A very small amount (~2%) of feedback was negative.
With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's student-centric approach and a smooth, positive study experience.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent teachers and a strong reputation, especially in science and technology. About 12% of feedback is negative, citing poor teaching transmission and faculty infrastructure issues.
Nothing to show
University reviews are highly positive, with ~100% of feedback being favorable. Students praise flexible schedules, interesting research and content, and small, interactive classes. Professors are noted as passionate and highly trained, fostering a comfortable and supportive atmosphere.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One review highlighted a strong master's program but noted minor English fluency issues with a few instructors.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.83/5. Students highlight excellent learning outcomes, experienced industry professionals as teachers, and current, practical case studies. The high quality of fellow students and facilities also contribute to a successful experience.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Nothing to show
Located in the very centre of Seville, the University is on the site of the Tobacco Factory in which the opera Carmen was set. A centuries old institution placed against a privileged backdrop convivial to learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
