Universidad de Carabobo - UC vs ESCP Business School vs Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP vs Rutgers University - RU vs Box Hill Institute

Side-by-side comparison from 195 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Boitekanelo College (5.00)
Universidad de Carabobo - UC: wins 0/7 categories
ESCP Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad José Antonio Páez - UJAP: wins 0/7 categories
Rutgers University - RU: wins 2/7 categories
Box Hill Institute: wins 0/7 categories
KCA University: wins 0/7 categories
Boitekanelo College: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Dentistry
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Dentistry
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
68 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Melbourne, Australia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Nairobi, Kenya
4.50
Read more reviews
71 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology
Gaborone, Botswana
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Health Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
4.09
4.48
4.38
Not rated
4.32
5.00
Win
Location
3.67
4.33
4.15
4.55
Win
Not rated
4.46
4.00
Professors
4.33
4.11
4.75
4.37
Not rated
4.49
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.33
4.80
2.95
4.28
Not rated
4.25
5.00
Win
Student life
3.67
4.17
4.68
4.58
Not rated
4.44
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
4.39
4.18
4.43
Not rated
4.61
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.67
3.27
3.48
4.11
Win
Not rated
3.65
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +Good campus facilities and activities
  • +Strong academic programs and ethical training
  • +European campuses and multicultural environment
  • +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
  • +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
  • +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities, including labs
  • +Strong connection between academics and practical/work fields
  • +Outstanding instructors and accessible faculty support
  • +Intellectually stimulating curriculum and diverse opportunities
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical and well-structured programs with supportive, knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Quality education and career-oriented focus
  • +Positive campus environment for collaboration and personal development
  • +Practical skills focus
  • +Quality of education & faculty expertise
  • +Supportive learning environment
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues.
  • -Lack of resources and outdated facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as unengaging and irrelevant by many.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or uninspiring.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are not engaging or relevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and responsiveness from staff is a problem.
Rating summary
What students say

The university exhibits a strong valuation of 4, with professors receiving a notable 4.33. Student life and location are also well-regarded at 3.67. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring a 2.67, while facilities and internationality fall within the mid-range. Overall, this institution offers a good balance, excelling in academic and student engagement aspects but facing challenges with housing.

Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.

Examining university ratings reveals a highly regarded institution. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors (4.75) and Student Life (4.675), indicating excellent academic instruction and vibrant campus activities. Facilities and Location also score well. However, Accomodation (3.475) and particularly Internationality (2.95) present areas for improvement. The overall Value (4.175) suggests a positive return for students.

Among surveyed categories, the university excels particularly in Student Life and Location, both scoring above 4.5. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest rating at 4.11. Other areas like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value also received strong ratings, generally falling between 4.28 and 4.43, indicating a well-rounded academic experience.

Nothing to show

This university excels in several key areas, with particularly high marks for Value (4.61), Professors (4.49), and Location (4.46). Student Life and Internationality also received strong scores, indicating a vibrant and diverse campus experience. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, receiving a considerably lower rating of 3.65.

This institution garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Its strongest areas, all receiving perfect scores, include Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. Areas that, while still strong, present a slight contrast are Location and Accommodation, both rated at a very respectable four out of five.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are predominantly positive (~86%), highlighting academic excellence, great professors, and good facilities. A small amount of feedback (~14%) notes a need for improved maintenance.

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.

All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.2/5. Recurring themes highlight excellent teachers, a complete curriculum, and good facilities. Some suggest incorporating more practical, work-field-linked programs and improved computer lab installations.

~100% of 68 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.32/5. Students highlight excellent education, caring professors, and available faculty.

Nothing to show

With ~93% positive reviews, students praise the university for its rewarding academic programs, well-structured curriculum, and supportive, knowledgeable lecturers. Practical learning and a collaborative campus environment are frequently highlighted.

Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students praise the college for providing practical skills, phenomenal education quality, and adept professors. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
55%
20%
35%
0%
63%
100%
4★
29%
38%
80%
62%
0%
27%
0%
3★
0%
5%
0%
3%
0%
10%
0%
2★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The University of Carabobo a good option to consider

The University of Carabobo is an excellent place to consider to study higher education. In addition, it is one of the main institutions of university education with the highest demand in the State of Carabobo, as a student of the Faculty of Engineering, I think that it is one of the best Faculties has a great demand for its educational excellence. The UC is a good option to consider for all those who wish to study higher education in Venezuela. As in every institution there will always be things to improve and perfect, I mean in terms of infrastructure in the case of the Faculty of Engineering.

Great international exposure

To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My university

I joined this university, not because it offers a high education but because of its conducive environment and supportive lecturers and professors. You can find people with different cultural backgrounds, which makes the university inclusive. One problem that the university shares with most universities in Nairobi, is the lack of ergonomic chairs in ICT rooms and the library.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close