Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Eko University of Medicine - Ekounimed
Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
- +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
- +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs
- +Practical, real-world focused programs
- +Experienced and insightful lecturers
- +Friendly community and international atmosphere
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +High-quality medical education
- +Accessible lecture materials
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
- +Balanced theory and lab work focus
- +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
- -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
- -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.
- -Chaotic organization and unclear expectations.
- -Lack of adequate resources and outdated facilities.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Poor communication and a lack of clear direction from administration cause frustration.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum issues lead to dissatisfaction with the learning experience.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its academic offerings and campus environment. Professors received the highest rating, closely followed by facilities and student life, which were also strong performers. Location and internationality garnered solid scores. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating, and value, which, while good, is not as prominent as other positive aspects.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Across the board, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in all assessed areas. From its modern facilities and outstanding professors to its vibrant student life and desirable location, every aspect garners top marks. Accommodation and internationality also received exceptional ratings, alongside an equally impressive assessment of value for money. There are no discernible weak areas, indicating a consistently excellent university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.
Around 62% of reviews are positive, highlighting friendly people, useful programs with practical focus, and experienced lecturers. A single negative review mentioned disorganization and uncertainty.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Reviews highlight efficient educational standards, accredited programs, and good classes with provided lecture materials.
Nothing to show
With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.
Nothing to show
As the title suggests, in my experience as a third-year business student, that is the best short description that can be given to HU. It definitely is not the best school and there are flaws, very annoying and disappointing at times, which take time to be solved. Most of these flaws are related to communication issues. In contrast, it has some advantages too. I had the opportunity to meet and be taught by experienced professionals who helped me develop my skills and enhance my knowledge and abilities as a young business student and professional. Another very good advantage is that at HU you get to do 2 internships and one study abroad, trio that other universities do not offer. Also, with the new program, there is so much flexibility to shape your own path but also the opportunity to study more languages which constitute a great asset for one's future career. The city represents a good pawn as well since it is very central, modern and student friendly. Also, for someone who wants to travel every now and then, it is a perfect location. What I can recommend you, the one who reads this review, the undecided student, is that you should consider these things when you decide which school you want to go to, try to have your own trade-off between what is important to you and how the institution is ranking in different aspects. HU is, in the end, a good school and the issues that are going on are not major and are fixable so do not worry too much about that. I just wanted to be realistic while writing this review because this is what I would have liked to read when I was in your place. Good luck!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
