Bialystok University of Technology - BUT vs Warsaw University of Technology vs University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun - UMK vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR
Side-by-side comparison from 159 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and helpful staff
- +International and student-friendly environment
- +Well-structured programs and facilities
- +Excellent faculty and professors
- +Recognized and high-quality programs
- +Engaging and practical learning experience
- +High-quality education and excellent professors
- +Valuable practical experience and research opportunities
- +Enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Competent and supportive lecturers and staff
- +High-quality, practical education and training
- +Efficient university management and resources
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Helpful and approachable staff, with strong communication skills.
- +Well-structured programs offering practical business and industry insights.
- +Positive and friendly learning atmosphere with good facilities.
- +Welcoming and supportive academic environment with approachable and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse and international student body with accessible English-taught programs.
- +Practical learning opportunities and personalized attention in engaging discussions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are a significant issue.
- -Course content is often irrelevant for students with a relevant BA.
- -Program lacks promised opportunities beyond specific career paths.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative & management issues are a consistent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Inconsistent curriculum and poor lecturer English proficiency hinder learning.
- -Difficulty in receiving promised refunds and poor communication from administration.
- -Lack of preparation for future careers due to teaching methods.
This institution boasts exceptional student life, scoring a remarkable 4.8. High marks were also given for its facilities, location, and overall value, all receiving a solid 4.4. However, the university's accommodation and internationality received lower ratings, at 3.8 and 3.6 respectively, indicating areas for potential improvement.
With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.
This university garners strong feedback across several key areas. The location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving a score of 4.8. Professors also received excellent marks, with a rating of 4.45. Accommodation represents the lowest score among the surveyed categories at 4.01. Overall, student life, facilities, and internationality also received favorable ratings between 4.1 and 4.2.
Overall, the university scores well across multiple facets. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area, with a rating of 4.28. Professors and student life also receive high marks, both above 4.1. The weakest area appears to be facilities, rated at 3.95, closely followed by value at 3.89, suggesting these could be opportunities for improvement.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
Across key metrics, the university garners strong approval, particularly in its **Professors, Location, and Student Life, all receiving a near-identical 4.29 rating.** Facilities also score well at 4.14, and Value is rated at a solid 4.0. The university's weakest areas are Accomodation, scoring 3.86, and Internationality, rated at 3.71.
The university garners solid marks across most areas, with Location standing out as a significant strength. Internationality and Professors also received favorable reviews. Conversely, Accomodation was rated the weakest, suggesting room for improvement in that specific aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores.
With ~83% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.5/5, students praise supportive professors, good facilities, and an international environment. Some minor housing improvements are noted.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.
With a 4.37/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, engaged professors, practical opportunities, and the city. A small percentage (~4%) mention disappointment with specific course content and limited opportunities in some programs.
All 19 reviews are positive, with students highlighting well-trained staff, competent lecturers, and a pleasant learning atmosphere. Some mention technical issues, but this is a minor recurring theme.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With a high average rating of 4.29/5, ~99% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise helpful academic and administrative staff, good professor communication, and a friendly learning environment.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable lecturers, a welcoming and diverse environment, and good learning standards. A smaller portion of feedback (~12%) mentions issues with curriculum adherence, financial transparency, and lecturer communication.
Nothing to show
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
The best part of my college experience is that everyone feels welcome and does their best to help. The teachings are at a very high level. It's very difficult to learn when using English as a second language, but I've learned a lot and expected it. The Clinical Skills Suite is comparable to other universities, which is why I was convinced that I would choose cm umk as my chosen university. The laboratory is also well equipped and all procedures are very strictly adhered to for our own safety. The campus is in the middle of town with easy access to grocery stores and nearby coffee shops. The city's campus is close to most dormitories, saving you money on public transport. The campus has a modern design, but more importantly, it is kept to a high standard and very clean 24 hours a day. Much effort has been put into keeping it clean, which shows it. It feels like a house away from home. Student unions are great and student life is very personal to everyone, but I have to say that the experience and life of the entire university is a place where the best memories can be made. The only thing I wasn't very happy with was the student support. It would be very helpful if someone could introduce me to writing essays, case scenario essays, reflections, and other scientific research face-to-face.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
I have gained my Bachelor degree and now I am about to finish my Master degree. The professors are really outstanding and teach not only theory, but also include practical exercises during classes. Additionaly, the university is located in the heart of the city and has great social life both locally and internationaly.
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
