Université Lumière Lyon 2 - L2 vs emlyon business school vs ESSCA School of Management vs INSEEC Business School vs ILERI School of International Relations
Side-by-side comparison from 83 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality teaching and internationally recognized educators
- +Accessible campus locations and good public transport
- +Opportunities for idea exchange and interactive learning
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +International focus and diverse programs
- +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
- +Supportive professors and student community
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +Broad international focus and cross-cultural learning
- +Strong professional development and recognized technical training
- +Opportunities for networking and future connections
Nothing to show
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of responsiveness and clear communication from staff is a major complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
This university exhibits a varied performance across key aspects. Its strongest areas are **Student Life (4.3)** and **Location (4.18)**, indicating a vibrant campus experience and desirable setting. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.58)** and **Facilities (2.9)** received the lowest scores, suggesting potential room for improvement in these practical resources. Other categories like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Overall, the university garners positive ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** standing out as exceptional strengths. Professors and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest area, with ratings for Facilities and Location also being moderate. The university presents a well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in student experience and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
With a 3.67 average rating, approximately 50% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers and interactive classes. Some reviews mention administrative and management inefficiency, with a desire for improved CROUS catering.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~67% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent programs, a valuable international focus, and professional development opportunities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
Nothing to show
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
