Riga Technical University - RTU vs Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv vs Valencia College vs Purdue University vs Perez University College - PUC
Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, modern, and applied engineering programmes
- +Well-organized university with excellent faculty and facilities
- +Clear teaching approach and up-to-date curricula
- +Excellent teaching and encouraging professors
- +Diverse opportunities and engaging student life
- +Strong academic reputation and well-organized programs
- +Accessible admissions and flexible program transfers
- +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
- +Valuable resources and guidance for academic success
- +Strong academic programs and challenging coursework
- +Supportive community and inclusive atmosphere
- +Valuable career opportunities and hands-on learning
Nothing to show
- +Strong employability support and career readiness.
- +Relevant and up-to-date academic programs.
- +Professional and accommodating faculty.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative inefficiency and unresponsiveness
- -Poor quality and unhelpful staff/faculty
- -Rising accommodation costs
- -Poor teaching quality and unfair assessment practices.
- -Dissatisfaction with the university system and overall experience.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication cause frustration.
- -Disorganized curriculum and unclear academic expectations lead to confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency regarding school policies and decisions.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for modern learning.
- -Unsupportive or inaccessible administrative and teaching staff.
Nothing to show
This institution receives positive feedback across most aspects, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated area. **Professors** and **Value** also score well. However, **Accomodation** presents a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated moderately well, indicating room for enhancement.
This institution scores exceptionally well for **Value**, its highest-rated aspect. **Location** and **Student Life** also received strong marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a comparatively lower rating. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside its strengths.
Considering university ratings, the institution excels in **Location** and **Value**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also demonstrate strong performance. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the lowest score at 3.71, with **Internationality** also falling below a 4.0. Overall, the university offers a positive experience, particularly regarding its environment and perceived worth.
This university garners particularly high marks in Internationality, rated at 4.55, and Accomodation, at 4.41. Value and Professors also received strong scores, both above 4.38. Student Life and Facilities are also well-regarded, exceeding 4.20. The Location, however, represents the weakest area, with a score of 3.96.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its location, receiving a perfect score of 5. Professors are also highly rated at 4.5. Conversely, facilities and student life are areas with moderate ratings at 3. Accommodations and internationality sit comfortably in the mid-range. The overall value of the university is positively assessed at 4.
Nothing to show
Most reviews (around 74%) highlight practical learning, modern facilities, and clear teaching, with some mentioning specialized engineering programs. A small percentage (about 4.2%) notes administrative delays and less helpful staff.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic traditions and supportive teachers. A small percentage of feedback notes dissatisfaction with the system or specific instructors.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise program variety, knowledgeable and interactive professors, and helpful staff. ~100% of feedback is positive.
Approximately 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, career opportunities, and a welcoming community. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight satisfaction with employability services, workshops, and career preparation. Some note challenges with off-campus accommodation and limited campus activities.
Nothing to show
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The program has been tailored to accommodate the ever-changing world of tech and fully equips pupils with the relevant industry specific knowledge they require as well as a broadened perspective on a plethora of subjects through electives and workshops. The campus is very small and there are very few activities to participate in. This makes the school-life balance hard to maintain as the semester is very intensive and requires consistent study. The lecturers are very professional, accommodating, eager to help and approachable.
Nothing to show
