Riga Technical University - RTU vs University of Latvia - LU vs EKA University of Applied Sciences vs Ventspils University of Applied Sciences - VUAS vs Baltic International academy - BIA
Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong technical and engineering focus with practical application
- +Professional and understandable professors and staff
- +Modern facilities and well-organized, clear teaching approach
- +Supportive lecturers and organized study process
- +Abundant extracurricular events and opportunities
- +Modernizing facilities and convenient location
- +Recognised degree and career success
- +Helpful, knowledgeable faculty and flexible schedule
- +Affordable study and European exposure
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong IT, logistics, and engineering programs
- +Practical knowledge and industry-experienced professors
- +Up-to-date infrastructure and labs
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Welcoming and friendly atmosphere
- +Well-structured programs with practical relevance
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Lack of helpfulness from staff and professors
- -Frequent rent increases for university dorms
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Some professors are perceived as unhelpful or lacking engagement.
- -Exploitative financial practices and lack of genuine academic concern are major issues.
- -The university treats students poorly and offers a subpar educational experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities are a major concern.
- -The administrative and management team consistently fails to address student concerns effectively.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective.
This university garners excellent marks in several key areas, with Location receiving the highest rating. Professors, Student Life, and Internationality also score strongly. Conversely, Accommodations present the weakest area, receiving a notably lower score than other aspects. Facilities and Value are rated mid-range, indicating good but not exceptional performance in those categories.
This university receives commendations in several key areas, with an outstanding 4.5 for Location. Professors and Value also scored highly at 4.38. Facilities and Student Life are well-regarded with a 4.25 rating. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality represent the weaker aspects, with scores of 3.91 and 3.85 respectively.
Considering the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in the area of **Professors**, achieving a score of 3.8. Conversely, **Student Life** and **Value** emerged as the weakest aspects, both receiving a score of 2.6. Other evaluated categories like Facilities, Location, Accommodation, and Internationality fell within a moderate range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a mixed performance, this institution excels in its **Location**, earning a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive strong marks, indicating good resources and faculty. However, **Student Life** and **Internationality** show room for improvement. **Accomodation** is a significant weakness, receiving no rating, and **Value** is rated moderately.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, with Facilities and Location both scoring an impressive 4.09. Student Life and Value are also well-regarded at 4.0 and 4.0 respectively. Accommodations are rated at 3.9. The weakest performing areas are Professors, at 3.73, and Internationality, at 3.64.
With a 4.07 average rating, ~82% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting strong engineering and technical programs with practical learning and modern facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative delays and unhelpful staff.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive lecturers, an organized academic environment, and convenient location. A single negative review found standards low compared to others.
Approximately 40% of reviews are positive, praising program recognition, helpful faculty, and flexible schedules. About 20% of feedback is negative, citing concerns about student treatment and perceived financial exploitation.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 rating from two reviews, students highly praise TSI, particularly for IT, logistics, and engineering programs. They highlight practical knowledge, experienced professors, and up-to-date facilities. No negative feedback was received.
Approximately 64% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers. Some mention administrative processes can be slow, with limited career support.
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
I'm just started studying Mathematics. The matherial, which lectors are giving to us, and the way of the studying is simple. Also there is options to study by ourselves in rooms with noise isolation. And also I can see, that the university collect a advises from students to develop.
The easiest way to begin with Europe Pretty cheap to study and possible to know more about the European institutions I d strictly recomend it to all the EU newcomers Facilitators are really about to give some Impact to students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
