Universidad Dr. José Gregorio Hernández - UJGH vs ESSEC Business School vs University of Applied Sciences Europe vs Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava - STU vs Széchenyi István University - SZE
Side-by-side comparison from 81 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent teaching quality and student preparation
- +Accessible costs and flexible schedules
- +Comfortable and safe facilities
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive preparation for life's challenges
- +Ample opportunities for study and practical work experience
- +Widely accepted European degree providing sufficient living standards
- +Strong academic programs and practical learning opportunities.
- +Modern campus facilities and a supportive, friendly environment.
- +Diverse international student body and cultural exchange.
- +Quality education and diverse academic programs
- +Supportive professors and positive learning environment
- +Opportunities for personal growth and skill development
- +Strong business and management programs
- +Active student life and extracurricular activities
- +Qualified and dedicated teaching staff
- -Excessive administrative burdens and unresponsive management.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Lack of clear communication and confusing policies.
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Many students are unhappy with the outdated facilities and lack of resources.
- -There are recurring complaints about poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff.
- -Lack of social life and events
- -Insufficient student engagement and planning initiatives
- -General areas needing improvement
- -Administrative and management issues cause delays and lack of support.
- -Absent key leadership figures create a sense of neglect.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Ineffective teaching and lack of academic support hinder progress.
Considering all surveyed aspects, the university presents a consistent, though unexceptional, profile. Its strengths and weaknesses are not clearly delineated as all categories received identical scores. This suggests a uniform, perhaps average, performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. Further information would be needed to identify areas for potential improvement or distinction.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its **location**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and overall **value**. These aspects are clearly areas of significant investment and positive student experience. Conversely, the **professors** received a comparatively lower rating of 3, suggesting this might be an area for potential improvement when contrasted with its other highly-rated features. The **facilities** also scored well at 4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its Location and Internationality, both scoring a high 4.3125. Student Life also received a positive rating of 4.2. Conversely, the Facilities at 3.875 and particularly the Value at 3.6875 represent areas with lower scores. Professors and Accommodation also received favorable marks, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
This university receives its highest marks for **Location**, with a rating of 4.33. **Professors** are also well-regarded at 3.71. Areas with lower ratings include **Accomodation** (3.00), **Internationality** (3.14), and **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both at 3.29. The overall **Value** is rated at 3.29.
Assessments indicate a university with particular strengths in its academic offerings and surrounding environment. Professors and location both received high marks, suggesting excellent teaching quality and a desirable setting. Student life and accommodation are also well-regarded. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, which received the lowest score, and internationality, though still above average. The overall value proposition is rated positively.
With a 4.33/5 average rating, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent teacher quality and preparation, comfortable facilities, and flexible/accessible schedules as key strengths.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This feedback is entirely positive, recommending the university for its comprehensive preparation for life's challenges and broad educational opportunities.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising the modern campus, supportive staff, and practical learning opportunities. A small percentage (around 6%) mentioned a lack of social life and events.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting enriching academics and faculty. Some students note administrative issues and a need for more practical resources.
With an average rating of 4/5, students praise the university's reputation, active student life, and qualified teaching staff. Some wish for more practical marketing courses and mention inconsistent administration.
Nothing to show
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Due to unexpected circumstances of the Covid-19 pandemic students faced some issues regarding accommodation in which they were moving from dormitory to another within one week. during the online study and since this is the first time the university conducts such an approach the outcome was satisfactory due to some delays in response and lack of some material ( sessions on Zoom meeting ), However, overall study experience is good. Not only the study experience was good also the university organized events for international studies on a monthly basis for site seeing to explore cities in Hungary in addition to other indoor events within the university premises, but the university also has several sports training and activities, social gathering to maintain the well-being of the students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
