London Metropolitan University vs City St George’s, University of London - City vs University of East London - UEL vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 299 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive mentors and approachable, knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse, multicultural environment and wide range of course options.
- +Career-focused programs with an emphasis on practical learning and employability.
- +Outstanding and supportive tutors
- +Strong focus on real-world experience and career opportunities
- +Positive and friendly university environment
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning and career support
- +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable staff
- +Diverse and friendly environment fostering friendships
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- -Poor course structure and lack of preparation for the workforce.
- -Subpar facilities and unresponsive program office.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff.
- -Poor quality of teaching and academic standards.
- -Administrative and financial concerns.
- -Lack of relevance for experienced professionals.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration.
- -Course content lacks relevance and is poorly delivered.
- -Limited support and inaccessible facilities are recurring problems.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Professors** are also highly regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not uniformly outstanding experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Facilities**, receiving a high score of 4.37. **Internationality** also scores exceptionally well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.93. Other areas like Professors, Student Life, Location, and Value all fall within a solid range, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific room for improvement in living arrangements.
This institution earns high marks for its **Location** (4.39) and **Facilities** (4.33), indicating these are considerable strengths. **Professors** (4.25) and **Internationality** (4.25) also received favorable scores. Areas with lower ratings include **Student Life** (3.88) and **Accomodation** (3.69), suggesting these aspects might present opportunities for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with some standout features.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty, diverse environments, and career-focused programs. A small percentage (around 7%) express dissatisfaction with teaching quality, course structure, or facilities.
With an average rating of 4.3/5, approximately 98% of reviews are positive, praising the excellent education, supportive and knowledgeable tutors, and valuable internship opportunities. A very small percentage of negative feedback mentions disappointing teaching quality and relevance for experienced professionals.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (approximately 97%) highlights supportive, diverse environments and industry-relevant practical learning. A small percentage (~3%) noted issues with lecturer responsiveness and course relevance.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
