Swiss School of Management - SSM vs The British University in Egypt vs Al-Azhar University - Azhar vs Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University vs Zewail City of Science and Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
- +Expert, supportive professors and rigorous, challenging academics
- +High-quality campus facilities and learning resources
- +Vibrant campus life, social activities, and diverse student body
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse international community and cultural exchange
- +Practical training and relevant curriculum
- +Supportive lecturers & practical, rewarding courses
- +Modern facilities & equipment
- +Expert professors and high-quality education
- +Hands-on learning and practical experience
- +Supportive staff and well-equipped campus
- +Practical application of learning and internships
- +Networking with diverse students
- +Strong academic reputation
- +High-quality, knowledgeable faculty
- +Diverse academic programs and learning opportunities
- +Positive student activities and general atmosphere
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Unhelpful professors and poor social engagement were major disappointments.
- -Limited and exclusive extracurriculars restricted student participation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies frustrate students.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication plague students.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in need of improvement.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant and lacking in practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
This university garners excellent marks for its facilities, achieving a high score of 4.63. Student life and value also stand out with strong ratings around 4.33 and 4.31 respectively. Accommodation is well-regarded at 4.13. However, the university's professors and internationality received the lowest ratings, both scoring 3.94. The location also scored a respectable 4.36.
This institution garners significant praise for its **location** and **student life**, both scoring above 4.3. **Professors** also receive strong marks. The university's **accommodation** stands out as a weaker area, with a rating of 3.8, and **value** is also rated somewhat lower. Facilities and internationality are rated solidly at 4.
This institution shines particularly in its **Facilities**, receiving a high score of 4.5. Other well-regarded aspects include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4. The **Internationality** score, at 3, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories, along with **Location** and **Accomodation**, which both sit at 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with notable strengths and some areas for potential improvement.
Across surveyed categories, the university demonstrates a solid performance, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving a high rating of 4.4. Facilities also scored well at 4. Facilities and professors are notable strengths, while student life and location represent areas with the lowest ratings, at 3 and 3.2 respectively.
Overall, this institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Student life, accommodation, and value for money stand out as its strongest areas, all receiving high marks. The university also scores well in facilities and professor quality. Conversely, internationality is the weakest point, with a rating lower than other categories.
This institution performs exceptionally well in **Internationality**, earning a high rating of 4.5. Other areas like **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received positive marks, all averaging 3.75. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, which scored 3.67 and 3.5 respectively, representing the lower end of the evaluated categories.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
Nearly all feedback (approximately 94%) is positive, highlighting rigorous academics, expert professors, and good facilities. A small amount of criticism (~6%) notes limited social life and occasional administrative responsiveness issues.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 based on 11 reviews, ~73% highlight positive experiences. Students commend knowledgeable and supportive professors, good campus community, and a solid theoretical foundation. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted life-changing experiences, academically rewarding courses combining theory and practice, and supportive lecturers. Minimal negative feedback was noted regarding administrative delays.
Students highly rate academics, professors, and facilities, with ~100% positive feedback. Some noted a need for better course organization and more student life engagement.
With a 3.67 average rating, approximately 67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the university as a top choice in Egypt, emphasizing practical learning and networking opportunities.
With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students highlight diverse learning opportunities and quality faculty. Limited attention to non-academic activities was noted in one review.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My university, Zewail City of Science and Technology, is a fantastic option for a high-quality education. I've had nothing but great experiences, from teachers to student services. The support team is usually kind and eager to assist with any academic or social adjustment issues. The lectures are delivered by qualified professors who have years of expertise and are up to speed on the latest research. Furthermore, the school provides all of the required amenities for students, such as computer laboratories, sports facilities, and scientific labs. Not to mention the numerous activities and events that encourage student invention and creativity. All of this contributes to my great overall experience at Zewail City of Science and Technology. I would very much recommend it to anyone looking to pursue higher education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
