University of Pittsburgh - PITT vs Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa vs Redeemer's University Ede - RUN vs Ecole Rockefeller vs Federal Polytechnic Ede - Fedepe

Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Pittsburgh - PITT: wins 0/1 categories
Andrei Şaguna University of Constanţa: wins 0/1 categories
Redeemer's University Ede - RUN: wins 0/1 categories
Ecole Rockefeller: wins 0/1 categories
Federal Polytechnic Ede - Fedepe: wins 0/1 categories
Medical University of Lublin - UMLUB : wins 1/1 categories
Nong Lam University: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Pittsburgh, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
7 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science with Data Science
Best programme: English
Best programme: Paramedical
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Best programme: School of Health Sciences/Medicine
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
3.97
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.57
3.00
3.73
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Professors
4.29
2.00
4.24
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.86
4.00
3.73
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Student life
4.14
4.00
3.97
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Value
4.29
3.00
4.24
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.86
2.00
3.72
5.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty
  • +Vibrant campus community and diverse student body
  • +Excellent location and opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Stable academic calendar and conducive learning environment
  • +Supportive, approachable, and dedicated faculty
  • +Affordable tuition and good student accommodation
  • +Highly regarded paramedical programs and attentive, supportive staff.
  • +Engaging courses and valuable internship opportunities.
  • +Encouraging environment fostering student confidence.
  • +Quality education and enlightening experience
  • +Conducive learning environment
  • +Accommodating lecturers
  • +Supportive learning environment and academic/personal growth opportunities
  • +Knowledge and skills for career preparation
  • +Dedicated lecturers

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of engagement and course structure

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations from the institution are consistently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical experience and career development are disappointing.
  • -Administrative & management issues are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of resources and support is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners strong praise, particularly for its **location**, which received the highest rating. Student life, professors, and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement. Internationality also falls slightly below the average rating.

Nothing to show

In its latest review, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in both **Professors** and **Value**, achieving identical high scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a well-rounded but not uniformly exceptional experience.

This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly in its professors, location, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect five. Student life and facilities are also highly regarded, with four-star ratings. The university demonstrates strong internationality, also earning a five. Its weakest area, though still positive, is its value for money, which is rated at four stars.

This educational institution receives outstanding marks, with perfect scores across facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation. Internationality is rated highly at a 4 out of 5, while the value proposition also stands at a strong 4. Overall, the university demonstrates excellence in most aspects of the student experience.

Across all assessed aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength, achieving a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every category. This includes its facilities, faculty, location, student life, accommodation, international appeal, and overall value. No specific areas were identified as weaker, indicating a consistently high standard across the board.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~86% positive rating from 7 reviews, students highlight excellent education, vibrant campus atmosphere, and great location. A small amount of feedback noted bureaucratic administration and a perceived focus on athletes over regular students.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.03/5 from 33 reviews, ~85% are positive. Students praise the stable academic calendar, excellent faculty, conducive learning environment, and affordable tuition. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, this university is positively perceived. The single review highlighted fame in the paramedical field, engaging teachers and courses, and supportive staff.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review highlights sound and quality education, a conducive environment, and accommodating lecturers. There is no negative feedback.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 100% of reviews being positive and an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a supportive learning environment, dedicated lecturers, and opportunities for academic and personal development.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
43%
0%
18%
0%
100%
100%
0%
4★
43%
0%
67%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
14%
100%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

What can i say about my univeristy?

Redeemer's University is a faith-based educational institution that prioritise learning, lectures and a conducive environment for its students, that is a major advantage of the school. speaking on disadvantages the school needs to work on its accomodation and feeding services.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close