Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs Lahore School of Economics vs Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs Skans School of Accountancy - Nil vs Rashid Latif Medical College

Side-by-side comparison from 79 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 1/4 categories
Lahore School of Economics: wins 0/4 categories
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 1/4 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/4 categories
Rashid Latif Medical College: wins 0/4 categories
Al-Aleem Medical College: wins 0/4 categories
Minhaj University Lahore - MUL: wins 2/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Marketing and Media
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Education in Educational Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
3.47
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
Win
3.62
4.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.11
5.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.60
3.32
4.00
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.58
3.08
5.00
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.17
4.00
4.50
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.76
2.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application and diverse minors
  • +Supportive and qualified faculty, professional and helpful instructors
  • +Engaging campus life with active societies and personal development opportunities
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and research focus
  • +Well-structured classes and available resources
  • +Quality education in a friendly environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of dissatisfaction.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as overly demanding with a focus on rote memorization rather than genuine learning.
  • -Lack of student life and unresponsive faculty contribute to a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Overcrowded and undersized classrooms.
  • -Lack of timely and effective communication from administration.
  • -Inadequate resources and outdated technology.
Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

Surveyed aspects of the university reveal a varied performance. Professors received the highest rating, suggesting a strong academic core. In contrast, accommodation was rated the lowest, indicating a significant area for improvement. Other categories like location and internationality fall within a moderate range, with student life and facilities also receiving average scores.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners outstanding marks across several key aspects. Its strongest areas are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly rated at 4. The weakest area, though still strong, is facilities, while value is a standout positive at 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting academically enriching programs, faculty support, and active societies. A small portion (~7.9%) of feedback mentions poor administration and excessive workload.

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. This single review highlights supportive professors, well-structured classes, and sufficient campus resources, creating a quality, research-focused environment.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
32%
100%
67%
0%
0%
100%
4★
31%
37%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
3★
11%
24%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Lse is not a university but a school

hello i am a student doing my third year at the Lahore school of economics . Lse is a university with zero student life, Pathetic administration specially the retired majors. They have got few good instructors but still i would not recommend anyone to go there.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close