Erasmus University Rotterdam - EUR vs University of Amsterdam - UvA vs Tilburg University vs Saxion University of Applied Sciences vs NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 489 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse, international student community and networking opportunities
- +High-quality, experienced, and industry-connected teaching staff
- +Well-structured, rigorous, and practical academic programs
- +Accessible programs and flexible study structures
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-designed, up-to-date curriculum
- +Excellent professors and specialized programs
- +Inclusive and diverse environment with international peers
- +Strong analytical skill development and practical learning opportunities
- +Practical, career-oriented curriculum and useful course content
- +Supportive and friendly teachers providing concrete feedback
- +Welcoming international environment and comfortable study spaces
- +Welcoming atmosphere and helpful staff
- +Practical, project-based learning (DBE)
- +Opportunities for real-world experience and international exposure
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world focus
- +International and diverse community
- +Supportive, close-knit environment
- -Excessive self-study required in courses.
- -General lack of course quality and unmet expectations.
- -Lack of administrative and faculty support
- -High costs with perceived low value and outdated facilities
- -Poor communication and inflexible policies
- -Disorganized administration and lack of student guidance.
- -Poor teacher support and patronizing interactions.
- -High cost of living and unpleasant city environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented by many students.
- -Poor communication and lack of teacher support are major issues.
- -Disorganization and unclear assessments lead to student confusion.
- -Inconsistent feedback and arbitrary grading practices are frustrating.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Inconsistent and poor quality instruction diminishes academic value.
Demonstrating commendable strengths, this institution excels in Internationality, boasting a score of 4.57. Other well-regarded areas include Location (4.42), Facilities (4.38), and Student Life (4.35), all reflecting positive student experiences. Notably, Accomodation received the lowest rating at 3.36, indicating a potential area for improvement. Professors and Value also received solid scores above 4.3.
This university scores exceptionally well in several key areas, with Location standing out as the highest rated at 4.59. Internationality also receives a strong score of 4.49. Conversely, Accomodation is the weakest point, with a significantly lower rating of 2.96. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are all rated around the 4.0 to 4.2 mark, indicating solid but not exceptional performance in these domains.
This institution garners excellent marks for its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both scoring a high 4.22. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.14, with **Student Life** and **Value** receiving solid ratings of 4.06 and 4.08 respectively. **Location** is rated moderately well at 3.83. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a notably lower score of 2.78.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in internationality, earning a rating of 4.42, and excels in facilities and value, both scoring 4.33. Student life is rated 3.67, slightly above the professor rating of 3.58. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a score of 3.
This institution garners exceptional ratings in **Facilities** (4.41) and **Internationality** (4.46), indicating a robust and globally connected campus environment. Student life also scores well at 4.07. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.62) and **Professors** (3.81) are the areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks across most aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and overall value are all rated at a near-perfect 4.67. Internationality stands out as a perfect 5. Accommodations, while still strong, are the lowest rated category at 4.33, representing the sole area for potential improvement.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99%), with students praising its multicultural environment, diverse course offerings, and high-quality teaching staff. A small amount of negative feedback notes room for improvement in course structure and self-study components.
~96% of reviews are positive, praising accessible programs, supportive lecturers, and useful facilities. A small ~4% of feedback highlights concerns about value, student support, and communication.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~92% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise excellent teaching, expert professors, and strong program specialization. A small percentage of negative reviews mention disorganization and limited guidance.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical learning and supportive teachers. Some mention occasional disorganization and a chaotic online platform. No negative reviews were received.
Around ~86% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere and practical, project-based learning. A smaller portion (~6.4%) of feedback criticizes poor organization, unclear assignments, and a lack of teacher availability or feedback.
Nothing to show
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight practical, real-world project experience and an international environment. The program is seen as future-focused and impactful.
The campus is quite large, but not too large. The staff and students are very international, I feel like the education is at a very high level and it's an enjoyable place to be with many of the buildings being modern with a lot of light. I'm in a smaller class with 30 persons and I think it really is a great University to do a Master's at.
I didn’t felt the program was worth my money and it was definitely not what I expected. From the professors to the actual syllabus I didn’t learned much and I feel this debt I just acquired was definitely a waste of time a big mistake
The city is quite bad to live in and ugly, on top of very expensive. The faculty of psychology is quite okay. Studying there has given me a good theoretical base. However, I have one major complaint, which is the way the university treats students individually. The student desk is the only way to obtain official documents from them (for example, the documents I needed to apply for a Master's degre) and aside from the difficult office hours and long wait time on the phone, I was literally told upon requesting a very necessary document "sorry, we´re not going to do that for you, it is too much work for us". when I suggested that I could put the document together myself and then just have it reviewed and stamped by them, she said htat it wouldn´t be valid. This resulted in me not being able to apply for Masters that year and taking a gap year, which is not the impact I ever thought a clerk would have on my life. Another complaint I have that resulted in a life-changing event is about my thesis. I chose to do a systematic review (within the Clinical Track) because it interested me, and I was fully informed that the program of the systematic review was still a pilot and subject to change. My supervisor was lovely and I had a great experience with her, that left me feeling like I learned something, and I was going to get a decent grade on said thesis that would then allow me to apply for a Clinical Psychology Masters in the Netherlands. For context, up until this point in my education, I had never failed an exam or a course as I always had average to high grades and I dedicate the appropriate time and effort to my studies. My thesis, on the other hand, was rather controversial. I received the grade I expected from my supervisor (which was within the range of my grades overall), whereas the second assessor failed me on half the criteria and didn't put in the effort to provide appropriate feedback. As the two grades were too different from each other, my thesis was reviewed by a third assessor, who just did the averages between the grades of the first two assessors and included sad faces ":(" in her feedback for my months of work, which all resulted in a grade that still hinders me in my academic progress, two years later. Upon respectfully confronting the third assessor I was offered neither an explanation nor a justification (perhaps I had been misled during the process of writing my thesis) for the feedback (which at times was completely erroneous as it contradicted published and peer reviewed literature I had consulted while while writing), and I was told that my thesis would just not be reasessed. I would not still be going on about this if it wasn't for the fact that I was just taught the findings of my thesis (which I was told was completely wrong) while studying for the master's degree that I did manage to get into with my grades. To sum up, while this faculty rigurously prepares students through content and theory, the students are nothing to them.
Saxion - CMGT - Creative Media and Game Technologies - 2.5/5 TLDR: I only recommend the CMGT course to someone who is already disciplined to REALLY study the gaming topic they are interested in outside the dedicated time for the university. If you are looking for a course that makes you "game industry ready" look elsewhere. I finished the CMGT (Creative Media and Game Technologies) course as an artist in 2022. I went to Saxion (Enschede) with the dream of becoming a concept artist for video games (as advertised on the official website), after 4 years and €10000 dept I can say that I would have gotten the same knowledge out of top €1000 in relevant courses. A lot of the topics we went through are just "oh that's interesting to know, so when can I learn to draw concept art?". There was a lack of focus for artist in general (2D and 3D), you never get deep into any topic and most things except the bare basics are for you to learn in your own time. In addition, the amount of actual gaming projects is laughable for a course that advertises itself as gaming focused. But there were good things, even great things. The fellow students were very great partners and the teachers are knowledgeable and easy going. There is a very low focus on "memorize this and write it down" type test. 95% of the (art) grades are project based, meaning you create something (concepts, prototypes etc.) with other CMGT students (Other branches of CMGT are programmer and designer). Enschede itself is a great city to life in, with more than enough places to visit to fill the years with activities. In the last 2 years the students focus on larger projects, and for me, it was the case that the actual document that will be uploaded is much, much more important than the actual product we create. This was very frustrating because as an artist, I want to make things, not write documents all day. I would only recommend the CMGT to someone that is: 1) In need of a guided education about the basics of game making (equivalent of easy to get courses online) but more expensive of course 2) Interested in living in the Netherlands and experiencing the culture 3) Looking for an "easy" bachelor that can be obtained if you put in a bit of effort 4) A hardworking individual that does the bachelor on the side while advancing in their own domain of interest. Afterword: At the end of my study, I was so removed from what I actually wanted to learn that I could not advance professionally in the field I wanted to work in (concept art). Instead, I learned some things about UI design, which to be honest is a topic I really don't care about. **Important Note: The last 2 years of my studies were impacted by the covid pandemic.
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
