Erasmus University Rotterdam - EUR vs Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs Delft University of Technology - TU Delft vs Eindhoven University of Technology - TU/e vs Inholland University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 334 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse and multicultural student body and international networking
- +Modern facilities and dynamic, fast-paced city environment
- +High-quality, rigorous academic programs with practical application
- +Expert and supportive faculty
- +Practical application and research focus
- +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
- +Welcoming community and diverse people
- +Challenging, practical, and focused engineering curriculum
- +Inspiring and unique learning environment
- +Innovative, problem-solving engineering focus
- +Dedicated, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
- +Engaging learning, personal development, and strong community
- +Passionate teachers & practical real-world experience
- +Supportive lecturers & readily available help
- +Project-based learning instead of traditional exams
- +Excellent academic structure and preparation for further studies.
- +Supportive and professional teaching staff with engaging methods.
- +Valuable location and city affordability.
- +Excellent academic programs and intellectual challenge
- +Strong practical application and hands-on learning
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- -Administrative and management issues like lack of housing support are frustrating.
- -Professors are unhelpful and dishonesty is present.
- -Excessive self-study is a major disappointment.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of pedagogical understanding.
- -Negative student experience and feeling ignored or pushed aside.
- -Programmatic issues and outdated facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and unengaging course content fails to meet student needs.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and communication problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poorly structured curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently disappointing.
- -Overloaded modules and excessive study hours detract from learning time.
- -Poor translation of lecture materials hinders understanding.
- -Inconsistent teaching with multiple professors per module creates confusion.
Rankings reveal a university with particularly strong internationality, rated at 4.58. Location is also a standout at 4.42. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.32. Other areas like facilities, professors, student life, and value all received solid ratings above 4.2, indicating a generally positive student experience.
With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.
This institution garners excellent reviews in several key areas, notably Facilities and Internationality, both scoring exceptionally high. Value and Location also received strong positive feedback. However, Accomodation stands out as a significant weakness, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects. Student Life, while good, is also an area that shows room for improvement.
This institution garners strong approval for its facilities and location, both scoring above 4.5. Professors and internationality also receive positive marks, exceeding 4.2. Student life ratings are solid at nearly 4.0. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation, with a score of 3.5, and value, which is rated at 4.35.
With a robust score of 4.58, the university excels in its **Facilities**. **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, however, present areas for improvement, scoring 3.75 and 2.92 respectively. Ratings for Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range.
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels in its **Location**, earning a strong 4.8, and its **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4. Their weakest area, however, lies with the **Professors**, who received a considerably lower score of 2.8. Other aspects like Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality fall in the moderate range.
Considering various aspects of the university experience, the location stands out with an exceptional rating. Facilities and value also received high marks, indicating strengths in these areas. Student life and accommodation were rated similarly positive. While professors and internationality were rated slightly lower, they still represent solid performance. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with particular excellence in its surroundings and practical resources.
~91% of reviews are positive, highlighting international diversity and quality teaching. A small ~2% of feedback mentions concerns about self-study and program support.
With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With 99 positive reviews (approximately 90%), students praise the welcoming atmosphere, varied academic programs, and practical learning approach. A small percentage of negative feedback (approximately 2.7%) mentioned some challenges with teaching quality and student support.
With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.35/5, students praise the university's focus on engineering, innovation, and real-world problem-solving. They highlight engaging courses, dedicated lecturers, and a supportive academic environment.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive. Students highlight passionate teachers, practical/project-based learning, and valuable real-world experience. There are no negative reviews.
With a 3.4/5 average rating, ~40% of reviews are positive, praising program structure, teaching quality, and staff helpfulness. No negative reviews were submitted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% are positive, highlighting excellent programs, engaging learning, and good facilities. A small ~8% of feedback was negative, citing demanding workloads and translation issues.
The campus is quite large, but not too large. The staff and students are very international, I feel like the education is at a very high level and it's an enjoyable place to be with many of the buildings being modern with a lot of light. I'm in a smaller class with 30 persons and I think it really is a great University to do a Master's at.
Nothing to show
Amazing opportunity to review TU Delft, great heart-warming university, great people and such a cozy place to study. This is the one and only university where I felt welcomed by everyone, the studies they offer have a long range of variety aswell
My experience within TU/e is overall positive mainly due to the student focused approach that the university utilises in order to accomodate new students and make them feel at home. One of the ways this was achieved was by having a vast variety of student associations for absolutely every hobby that one might have. On top of that, the university promotes and encourages the participation within student teams which is a perfect bridge between studying and working as you get to experience how a real work environment functions while being surrounded by students. The university also provides different levels of guidance so that one can tackle any problem they face.
I started my journey with Inholland international creative business in September 2022. What sets this program apart from traditional university business majors is that we don't have exams. Instead we have projects that need to be completed, each semester we get different assignments based on the module of study, some of them are individual and some are in groups. The project-based approach to learning can be a refreshing change from traditional exams, especially for people that never liked exams. Located in close proximity to the city center and train station, the uni is easily accessible. The building itself is relatively new but not really big. The course material is engaging and not overly challenging, especially for those interested in the creative industry. The studies give you some free time to explore other interests or for a part-time job. Teachers are nice and helpful, you can always ask them any questions. I recommend asking a lot, it always helps! For first-year students, the university offers accommodation support, since it's not easy to find one especially in the netherlands. The university organizes some additional events or activities that everybody can take part in. Some of the ones I remember are: theater classes, classouting, painting cups, making tie-dye tote bags and Christmasmarket. Also for first years at the beginning of the uni year we have an intro week to meet people from your year and get to know them in a chill atmosphere (beach day/ boat trip). The only flaw so far is a slight inaccuracy in the program. Due to changes in the curriculum, some teachers' answers may differ in terms of assignments. However, a good solution for this is to direct questions related to assignments to the teacher who is grading them. Overall my experience so far is pretty good and I can recommend it to anyone interested in the same major.
TU Vienna is a great university, really good located in the center of Vienna. The main problems are that they have very little offer to practice what was learned during lectures and apply knowledge. It seems that they spend their money on increasing the public impression rather than on their students. What they forget here, is that the students are the future not only of the university but as well of a country. They are also a few extremely hard exams that only slow students down and that are unnecessary unfair. The dean and even the rector is aware of that and still, the professors can do whatever they want to do. I am wondering why professors have such extreme power? Besides the university is also lacking social activities. And voluntarily student organizations that offer services to students for free are not supported but in fact partly boycotted by the university internal Career Center. Also exchange opportunities in particular outside of Europe are very bad. The university has potential, sadly it is not using it.
Nothing to show
