Erasmus University Rotterdam - EUR vs Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs Delft University of Technology - TU Delft vs Eindhoven University of Technology - TU/e vs Inholland University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 326 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse, international student community and networking opportunities
- +High-quality, experienced, and industry-connected teaching staff
- +Well-structured, rigorous, and practical academic programs
- +Expert and supportive faculty
- +Practical application and research focus
- +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
- +Strong engineering and technical focus.
- +Practical and creative learning approach.
- +Supportive community and excellent resources.
- +Engaging, practical courses with real-world focus
- +Supportive, dedicated, and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Strong community, personal attention, and networking opportunities
- +Passionate teachers & practical real-world experience
- +Supportive lecturers & readily available help
- +Project-based learning instead of traditional exams
- +Excellent academic structure and preparation for further studies.
- +Supportive and professional teaching staff with engaging methods.
- +Valuable location and city affordability.
- +Excellent academic programs and intellectual challenge
- +Strong practical application and hands-on learning
- +Supportive environment and vibrant campus life
- -Excessive self-study required in courses.
- -General lack of course quality and unmet expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
- -Poor teaching quality and pedagogy.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unwelcoming and pushy student and teacher culture.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and communication problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Poorly structured curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently disappointing.
- -Overloaded modules and excessive study hours detract from learning time.
- -Poor translation of lecture materials hinders understanding.
- -Inconsistent teaching with multiple professors per module creates confusion.
Demonstrating commendable strengths, this institution excels in Internationality, boasting a score of 4.57. Other well-regarded areas include Location (4.42), Facilities (4.38), and Student Life (4.35), all reflecting positive student experiences. Notably, Accomodation received the lowest rating at 3.36, indicating a potential area for improvement. Professors and Value also received solid scores above 4.3.
With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.
This university is notably strong in its **Facilities** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Value** and **Location** also stand out with high marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant area for improvement, with the lowest rating among all categories. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received respectable but less exceptional scores, indicating room for growth.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its facilities, with a rating of 4.57, and location, scoring 4.54. Professors and internationality also received favorable scores above 4.2. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, followed by student life at 3.95. Overall value is rated at 4.36.
With a robust score of 4.58, the university excels in its **Facilities**. **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, however, present areas for improvement, scoring 3.75 and 2.92 respectively. Ratings for Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range.
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels in its **Location**, earning a strong 4.8, and its **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4. Their weakest area, however, lies with the **Professors**, who received a considerably lower score of 2.8. Other aspects like Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality fall in the moderate range.
Considering various aspects of the university experience, the location stands out with an exceptional rating. Facilities and value also received high marks, indicating strengths in these areas. Student life and accommodation were rated similarly positive. While professors and internationality were rated slightly lower, they still represent solid performance. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with particular excellence in its surroundings and practical resources.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~99%), with students praising its multicultural environment, diverse course offerings, and high-quality teaching staff. A small amount of negative feedback notes room for improvement in course structure and self-study components.
With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
With ~97% positive reviews and an average 4.21/5 rating, students praise academic focus, practical approaches, diverse communities, and supportive resources. A small percentage (~3%) noted difficulties with course stress or a direct teaching style.
With an average rating of 4.34/5 from 65 reviews, ~94% are positive. Students praise the focus on engineering, innovation, and practical applications. They highlight engaging teaching, supportive lecturers, and a strong sense of community.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 13 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive. Students highlight passionate teachers, practical/project-based learning, and valuable real-world experience. There are no negative reviews.
With a 3.4/5 average rating, ~40% of reviews are positive, praising program structure, teaching quality, and staff helpfulness. No negative reviews were submitted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% are positive, highlighting excellent programs, engaging learning, and good facilities. A small ~8% of feedback was negative, citing demanding workloads and translation issues.
The campus is quite large, but not too large. The staff and students are very international, I feel like the education is at a very high level and it's an enjoyable place to be with many of the buildings being modern with a lot of light. I'm in a smaller class with 30 persons and I think it really is a great University to do a Master's at.
Nothing to show
Hello, [Skip to "Conclusion" for a brief summary] In this post, I’ll share my experience with the TU Delft Industrial Design Engineering bachelor's program as a graduate, so that future students can make a more informed decision. I chose this bachelor’s program because I expected it to involve a lot of engineering and technical content, which would help me understand how most products are made, think production techniques, appropriate material use, product manufacturing, and the integration of technology and mathematics that’s common in modern products. However, I ended up learning very little about these topics during my time in the program. The study mainly consisted of filling out Miro (an online platform) templates, coming up with systems, and focusing on sustainability (which, to be fair, isn't necessarily a bad thing). But I never felt like I was learning anything new; I was just repeatedly filling in the same kinds of templates for the DP/PO (Design Project/Project Organisatie) courses throughout the full three years. Each year, you follow two DP/PO courses. The only courses I personally found useful in terms of learning product design were the drawing classes and a first-year SolidWorks course (3D modeling). Normally, I find math courses boring and difficult, but thanks to this bachelor’s, I actually really enjoyed the two math/physics courses (Product Dynamics and Product Statics). For the first time in a while, I felt like I was doing something meaningful, had to put in effort, and was actually learning something new. Another thing I really disliked about this program is how “school-like” it’s structured. You're required to be on campus every day from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM, working in a so-called “studio” (classroom) with your fellow students, supposedly to learn from each other. This might work for some people, but for me (and I think for others too), it didn’t. I can’t focus well in noisy, crowded spaces, and I rarely connected with my fellow students. The social atmosphere was always centered around the typical student lifestyle (like student associations), and I wasn’t involved in that kind of life at all. The strict scheduling was probably the worst part. It made me feel like I was still in high school, instead of being a responsible adult who should be allowed to structure their own time. In many courses, you’re also penalized if you’re absent or not actively participating in class. Your final grade often drops as a result, especially since there’s always a rubric item about “communication and presence” of the student. Now on to a very different, but important point I want to share. I’m a guy with a Turkish background/ethnicity. This has, in my experience, had a significant impact on how I was treated and assessed during my studies. Because of my appearance, I stood out a lot in this predominantly Dutch/white bachelor’s program. I was one of the very few students with a migration background (I could count them on one hand, out of 300+ students in my year). In group projects and reports, I often felt like I wasn’t taken seriously by the lecturers. I never really felt welcome at the faculty or in the studios, I often felt like an outsider. The assessments for reports/projects were always subjective. Yes, there’s a so-called “rubric,” but it’s completely vague and can be interpreted in many ways, so you never know whether you’ve actually met the expectations. In my opinion, grading was purely based on the teacher’s personal opinion, and this was even confirmed by one of the teachers, who admitted the rubrics were “kind of nonsense” and that they just decide the grade based on how they feel about you and your work. As a result, I rarely received high marks for assignments, even though I consistently scored 8s on exams, which are graded objectively. I even went to the study advisor once because I had been unfairly graded. But even the study advisor couldn’t care less. He flat-out said “NO” to my face when I expressed my concerns emotionally. I didn’t even get a fake “that’s unfortunate” or a polite smile. That showed me that basic empathy is not standard for everyone. In my view, these are the bare minimum responses you’d expect when a student is struggling. That’s why I want to clearly state in this post that, in my experience, there’s a significant amount of racism within the IDE bachelor’s program at TU Delft. You might be wondering, after reading all this, “Why didn’t you just quit the program?” I started this program during the COVID outbreak, which meant my entire first year was online (with mandatory Zoom attendance from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM). So at first, I thought my negative experience was due to the pandemic. When I finally got to campus in my second year, I realized too late that this program just wasn’t the right fit for me. But I’m someone who always sees things through and doesn’t quit halfway. Since I had already completed more than a year, I was determined to finish. Conclusion All in all, I strongly advise against choosing this bachelor’s program if your goal is to pursue a real engineering-focused, challenging, and educational degree, because IDE at TU Delft is certainly not that. To future students with a migrant background: only consider this program if you’re planning to do it with a friend. You’re unlikely to make many friends here, and you’ll probably end up feeling lonely and like an outsider, especially if your values or cultural background differ from the average “IDE” student. I’m now studying something else at a different university, and I’m much happier. I’m achieving great results and feel appreciated. Just to be clear: my review is not about TU Delft as a whole, it is specifically about the Industrial Design Engineering bachelor’s program. If you have any questions after reading my “mini-book,” feel free to send me a private message on Reddit or leave a comment under this post. I’m happy to help you make a better-informed study decision, something I, unfortunately, didn’t have.
My experience within TU/e is overall positive mainly due to the student focused approach that the university utilises in order to accomodate new students and make them feel at home. One of the ways this was achieved was by having a vast variety of student associations for absolutely every hobby that one might have. On top of that, the university promotes and encourages the participation within student teams which is a perfect bridge between studying and working as you get to experience how a real work environment functions while being surrounded by students. The university also provides different levels of guidance so that one can tackle any problem they face.
I started my journey with Inholland international creative business in September 2022. What sets this program apart from traditional university business majors is that we don't have exams. Instead we have projects that need to be completed, each semester we get different assignments based on the module of study, some of them are individual and some are in groups. The project-based approach to learning can be a refreshing change from traditional exams, especially for people that never liked exams. Located in close proximity to the city center and train station, the uni is easily accessible. The building itself is relatively new but not really big. The course material is engaging and not overly challenging, especially for those interested in the creative industry. The studies give you some free time to explore other interests or for a part-time job. Teachers are nice and helpful, you can always ask them any questions. I recommend asking a lot, it always helps! For first-year students, the university offers accommodation support, since it's not easy to find one especially in the netherlands. The university organizes some additional events or activities that everybody can take part in. Some of the ones I remember are: theater classes, classouting, painting cups, making tie-dye tote bags and Christmasmarket. Also for first years at the beginning of the uni year we have an intro week to meet people from your year and get to know them in a chill atmosphere (beach day/ boat trip). The only flaw so far is a slight inaccuracy in the program. Due to changes in the curriculum, some teachers' answers may differ in terms of assignments. However, a good solution for this is to direct questions related to assignments to the teacher who is grading them. Overall my experience so far is pretty good and I can recommend it to anyone interested in the same major.
TU Vienna is a great university, really good located in the center of Vienna. The main problems are that they have very little offer to practice what was learned during lectures and apply knowledge. It seems that they spend their money on increasing the public impression rather than on their students. What they forget here, is that the students are the future not only of the university but as well of a country. They are also a few extremely hard exams that only slow students down and that are unnecessary unfair. The dean and even the rector is aware of that and still, the professors can do whatever they want to do. I am wondering why professors have such extreme power? Besides the university is also lacking social activities. And voluntarily student organizations that offer services to students for free are not supported but in fact partly boycotted by the university internal Career Center. Also exchange opportunities in particular outside of Europe are very bad. The university has potential, sadly it is not using it.
Nothing to show
