Stockholm University - SU vs University of Gothenburg vs Linköping University - LU vs Umea University - UMU vs Stockholm Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring and knowledgeable professors
- +Engaging and flexible course content
- +Supportive campus environment
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Well-equipped research environments and facilities
- +Interesting and well-organized programs
- +Supportive faculty and engaging programs
- +Beautiful and well-equipped campus facilities
- +Opportunities for student initiative and collaboration
- +Excellent teachers and engaging student life.
- +Pleasant and convenient location and facilities.
- +Positive international atmosphere and good university reputation.
- +Excellent teaching quality and global student community
- +Broadened horizons and expanded knowledge in business and political science
- +Abundant working opportunities to offset living costs
- +University's quality and campus facilities.
- +Hands-on, immersive, and creative learning with freedom to shape studies.
- +Direct industry insights and practical application from experienced professionals.
- +Strong focus on building relationships with driven, like-minded peers.
- -Poor administrative and management responsiveness to student issues.
- -Lack of adequate support for academic and personal conflicts.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues from the administration frustrate students.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as inadequate or uninspiring.
- -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant course content.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of practical application.
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a problem.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of engagement
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of effective communication and unclear expectations are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie with its professors, receiving a strong rating of 4.24. Value and facilities also scored well, both above 4.1. Conversely, the location was the least favorably rated category at 3.77. Student life and accommodation are rated at a solid 4 and 3.85 respectively.
This institution garners exceptional marks for its location, boasting a rating of 4.86. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.71. Professors receive a solid 4.57, and the overall value is rated at 4.29. Student life scores a respectable 4. The weakest area by a significant margin is accommodation, with a score of just 2.86.
This university achieves excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities and Location both scoring an outstanding 4.5. Student Life and Value are also highly rated at 4.3. While Professors and Accomodation are rated slightly lower, they remain strong at over 4.1. Internationality also receives a commendable 4.29 rating.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its Facilities, Student Life, Internationality, and perceived Value, all receiving a near-perfect score. Professors are also rated favorably, while Location scores a solid 4. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accomodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.67.
This institution shines with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality. Student Life also receives a strong endorsement. However, Accomodation and Value for money present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings compared to other aspects of the university experience.
This institution presents a mixed rating profile. Its strongest areas include professors and value, both receiving a solid 3.5. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, scoring a low 2. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately at 2.5, while location and student life achieve a respectable 3.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Internationality also received high marks, rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, though still very good at 4.5, reflecting a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.
With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising approachable and knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and good campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.
With a 4.71/5 average rating from 7 reviews, students report overwhelmingly positive experiences, highlighting exceptional faculty and enriching academic environments. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.16 average rating from 19 reviews, approximately 79% of students praise the beautiful, modern campus and supportive, helpful faculty. A small ~5% of feedback mentioned curriculum concerns.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three student reviews were positive. Recurring themes highlighted good teachers, great student life, and convenient facilities. No negative feedback was provided.
This university garners a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students praise exceptional teaching quality and opportunities for personal and academic growth.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, most feedback is positive (~100%). One student found the Borlänge campus building great but struggled with obtaining student information through confused online platforms.
Both university reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the immersive, hands-on approach, freedom to shape studies, and the opportunity to build relationships. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.
SU is a quite vibrant school and I am quite satisfied so far. I believed my programme can help unlock multiple career prospects in the future, The professors are kind and always willing to provide assistance.
Nothing to show
The campus culture is amazing. I have heard horror stories from other international students that its hard for them to find friends and have a social life in Sweden. But its not the case here. I have had some of the best moments of my life in this uni. Campus life is the best here in my opinion
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show