Stockholm University - SU vs Royal Institute of Technology - KTH vs Lund University vs University of Gothenburg vs Umea University - UMU

Side-by-side comparison from 97 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Stockholm University - SU: wins 0/7 categories
Royal Institute of Technology - KTH: wins 4/7 categories
Lund University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Gothenburg: wins 2/7 categories
Umea University - UMU: wins 1/7 categories
Dalarna University: wins 0/7 categories
Stockholm School of Economics - SSE: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Lund, Sweden
4.40
Read more reviews
46 reviews
×
Best programme: Media and Communication
Best programme: AI and Data Management
Best programme: Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.80
Win
4.28
4.71
4.67
2.00
Not rated
Location
3.77
4.20
4.31
4.86
Win
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Professors
4.24
4.40
4.23
4.57
Win
4.33
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.04
5.00
Win
4.37
4.71
4.67
2.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.60
4.45
4.00
4.67
Win
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.16
4.80
Win
4.20
4.29
4.67
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.85
4.60
Win
4.01
2.86
3.67
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Inspiring and knowledgeable professors
  • +Engaging and flexible course content
  • +Supportive campus environment
  • +World-class facilities and inspiring study atmosphere
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application and flexibility
  • +Engaging and approachable instructors
  • +High-quality education and expert faculty
  • +Vibrant student life and diverse community
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Well-equipped research environments and facilities
  • +Interesting and well-organized programs
  • +Excellent teachers and engaging student life.
  • +Pleasant and convenient location and facilities.
  • +Positive international atmosphere and good university reputation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor administrative and management responsiveness to student issues.
  • -Lack of adequate support for academic and personal conflicts.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
  • -Discrimination and lack of opportunities post-graduation.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues from the administration frustrate students.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as inadequate or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie with its professors, receiving a strong rating of 4.24. Value and facilities also scored well, both above 4.1. Conversely, the location was the least favorably rated category at 3.77. Student life and accommodation are rated at a solid 4 and 3.85 respectively.

Exceptional marks were awarded in several key areas, notably a perfect score for **Internationality**. **Facilities** and **Value** also received very high ratings. The university performs well across **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, with solid scores for **Professors** and **Location**. While no area received a low rating, **Location** represents the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.

Student life emerges as the university's strongest area, boasting the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like location, internationality, and facilities also scored well, with professors and value demonstrating solid, albeit slightly lower, marks.

This institution garners exceptional marks for its location, boasting a rating of 4.86. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.71. Professors receive a solid 4.57, and the overall value is rated at 4.29. Student life scores a respectable 4. The weakest area by a significant margin is accommodation, with a score of just 2.86.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its Facilities, Student Life, Internationality, and perceived Value, all receiving a near-perfect score. Professors are also rated favorably, while Location scores a solid 4. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accomodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.67.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising approachable and knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and good campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.

All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.75/5. Students praise world-class research facilities, inclusive culture, and opportunities for theory-practice integration. Friendly, engaging instructors and diverse, flexible courses are also highlighted.

With a 4.41 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, praising high-level education, great student life, and community. A very small amount of negative feedback mentioned racism and time/money waste.

With a 4.71/5 average rating from 7 reviews, students report overwhelmingly positive experiences, highlighting exceptional faculty and enriching academic environments. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three student reviews were positive. Recurring themes highlighted good teachers, great student life, and convenient facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
25%
75%
54%
71%
67%
0%
0%
4★
68%
25%
35%
29%
33%
0%
0%
3★
4%
0%
9%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
SU Review

SU is a quite vibrant school and I am quite satisfied so far. I believed my programme can help unlock multiple career prospects in the future, The professors are kind and always willing to provide assistance.

Nothing to show

Great university, but not so inclusive

The university is beautiful, there is no doubt about that. Although it is one of the most multicultural campuses in the world, the course I took was not inclusive for foreign students. The course was advertised as a course designed specifically for foreigners, with classes in English. In practice, many of the classes on the syllabus were actually in Swedish, and the ones that were in English gave exercises or texts in Swedish. I even had a disagreement with one of the professors who, although he was teaching a class that was supposed to be entirely in English, brought slides in Swedish and spoke exclusively in Swedish. When I asked during the break if the class shouldn't be in English, he ridiculed me in front of the class and said that if I was uncomfortable, I should have said so beforehand. The universitys advisors were very understanding, but in the end, I had to give up many of the assigned subjects and replace them with subjects that had nothing to do with my field, just because they were, in fact, taught in English.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close