Stockholm University - SU vs Royal Institute of Technology - KTH vs Malmö University - MAU vs Jönköping University - JU vs Dalarna University

Side-by-side comparison from 78 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hyper Island (5.00)
Stockholm University - SU: wins 0/7 categories
Royal Institute of Technology - KTH: wins 3/7 categories
Malmö University - MAU: wins 0/7 categories
Jönköping University - JU: wins 0/7 categories
Dalarna University: wins 0/7 categories
Stockholm School of Economics - SSE: wins 0/7 categories
Hyper Island: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Stockholm, Sweden
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
4.80
3.62
4.00
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
3.77
4.20
3.90
3.89
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.24
4.40
Win
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.04
5.00
Win
3.95
4.20
2.00
Not rated
4.50
Student life
4.00
4.60
3.55
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.16
4.80
3.57
4.10
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.85
4.60
Win
3.23
3.40
3.00
Not rated
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Inspiring and knowledgeable professors
  • +Engaging and flexible course content
  • +Supportive campus environment
  • +World-class facilities and inspiring study atmosphere
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application and flexibility
  • +Engaging and approachable instructors
  • +Supportive and approachable professors
  • +Relevant and forward-thinking curriculum
  • +Diverse and inclusive learning environment
  • +International and diverse student body
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
  • +Supportive environment with inspiring teachers

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on, immersive, and creative learning with freedom to shape studies.
  • +Direct industry insights and practical application from experienced professionals.
  • +Strong focus on building relationships with driven, like-minded peers.
Cons
  • -Poor administrative and management responsiveness to student issues.
  • -Lack of adequate support for academic and personal conflicts.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Misaligned curriculum and teaching methods
  • -Poor academic quality and unhelpful faculty.
  • -High tuition costs are not justified by the educational experience.
  • -Significant challenges with job prospects and societal inclusion for immigrants due to racism.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie with its professors, receiving a strong rating of 4.24. Value and facilities also scored well, both above 4.1. Conversely, the location was the least favorably rated category at 3.77. Student life and accommodation are rated at a solid 4 and 3.85 respectively.

Exceptional marks were awarded in several key areas, notably a perfect score for **Internationality**. **Facilities** and **Value** also received very high ratings. The university performs well across **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, with solid scores for **Professors** and **Location**. While no area received a low rating, **Location** represents the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.

Analyzing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels in its **Internationality** (3.95) and **Professors** (4), indicating strong global engagement and a well-regarded academic staff. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.23) presents the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Other aspects like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range.

This institution generally receives positive feedback, with particular strengths in **internationality (4.2)**, **value (4.1)**, and **professors (4)**, alongside excellent **facilities** and **student life**. Accommodation is the comparatively weakest area, scoring **3.4**. The location also received a slightly lower, though still respectable, rating.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Internationality also received high marks, rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, though still very good at 4.5, reflecting a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising approachable and knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and good campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.

All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.75/5. Students praise world-class research facilities, inclusive culture, and opportunities for theory-practice integration. Friendly, engaging instructors and diverse, flexible courses are also highlighted.

Most students (~74%) praise Malmö University's forward-thinking environment, modern facilities, and supportive professors. A small percentage (~9.5%) report issues with resources like printers and overpriced course materials.

With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting a highly international environment, practical learning, and student life. One ~7% review found the study difficulty low.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Both university reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the immersive, hands-on approach, freedom to shape studies, and the opportunity to build relationships. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
75%
10%
36%
0%
0%
100%
4★
68%
25%
71%
57%
0%
0%
0%
3★
4%
0%
10%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
5%
7%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
SU Review

SU is a quite vibrant school and I am quite satisfied so far. I believed my programme can help unlock multiple career prospects in the future, The professors are kind and always willing to provide assistance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close