Mary Immaculate College - MIC vs Dublin City University - DCU vs University of Limerick - UL vs University of Galway vs National University of Ireland Maynooth - NUIM

Side-by-side comparison from 255 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
Mary Immaculate College - MIC: wins 2/7 categories
Dublin City University - DCU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Limerick - UL: wins 0/7 categories
University of Galway: wins 0/7 categories
National University of Ireland Maynooth - NUIM: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 5/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Secondary Education
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Accounting
Galway, Ireland
4.10
Read more reviews
62 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Arts in Sociology
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Category ratings
Facilities
2.00
4.27
4.21
4.06
3.63
4.44
Win
4.13
Location
2.00
3.75
4.01
4.18
4.12
4.74
Win
3.75
Professors
5.00
Win
4.35
4.28
4.41
4.24
4.75
4.13
Internationality
1.00
4.18
4.21
4.11
3.94
4.60
Win
4.13
Student life
2.00
4.24
4.23
3.98
4.06
4.56
Win
3.63
Value
5.00
Win
4.30
4.32
4.18
4.06
4.50
4.13
Accommodation
3.00
4.07
3.94
3.56
3.41
4.32
Win
3.57
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Close-knit community and personal lecturer relationships
  • +Strong sense of togetherness and unity among students
  • +Excellent teaching programs and student support
  • +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
  • +Welcoming and friendly student community
  • +Positive and smooth overall university experience
  • +Practical skills and career preparation
  • +Supportive and friendly academic staff and community
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +Supportive and engaging faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life and location
  • +Excellent academic programs and facilities
  • +Excellent teaching quality and supportive faculty
  • +Diverse and inclusive campus with vibrant student life
  • +Strong range of facilities and programs, especially in humanities, social sciences, business, and science
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
  • +Rich international environment and diverse student body
  • +Personal and professional development opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and insufficient support hinder learning.
  • -Lack of career guidance and irrelevant research suggestions from faculty.
  • -Poor quality of education and facilities not worth the cost.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Inflexible and irrelevant curriculum often fails to engage students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shows a stark contrast in its ratings. It excels significantly in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its **Internationality** is a clear weak point, scoring only one. Facilities, Location, and Student Life also received low marks, indicating areas for considerable improvement. Accommodations sit in the middle with a moderate rating.

This university garners favorable ratings across most aspects, with **Professors** and **Value** standing out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive high marks, exceeding 4.2. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, with scores around 4.0 and 4.1 respectively. The **Location** is the weakest performing category, though still respectable at 3.75.

Analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception. The strongest area is **Value** (4.32), closely followed by **Professors** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.23). **Accommodations** stand out as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating at 3.94. Other categories like Facilities and Internationality also scored well above average.

This institution receives excellent marks for its **professors**, with a rating of 4.41. **Value** and **location** also stand out positively, both scoring above 4.18. **Student life** and **internationality** are well-regarded, while **facilities** are rated solidly at 4.06. The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is **accommodation** at 3.56.

This university exhibits a strong academic profile, with professors receiving particularly high marks. Student life and location also score well, indicating a positive overall experience for many. However, facilities and accommodation represent areas for potential improvement, scoring notably lower than other assessed categories. Internationality and value are rated competently, rounding out a generally favorable, though not perfect, university assessment.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting a strong sense of community, close lecturer-student relationships, and excellent teaching. Some mention the college's compact size and limited on-site facilities.

With a 4.49 average rating from 61 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers, a welcoming community, and a positive academic experience.

With an average rating of 4.24/5, approximately 99% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, practical skills, and a vibrant learning atmosphere. A single negative review mentioned concerns about career prospects and faculty motivation.

With ~93% positive reviews and an average of 4.1/5, students highlight supportive atmospheres, engaging lecturers, and vibrant campus life. Modern facilities and challenging academics are frequently praised.

With a 4.06/5 average rating, ~78% of 18 reviews are positive, praising contemporary amenities, lively campus, teaching quality, and diverse course offerings. No negative feedback was recorded.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
51%
28%
19%
28%
75%
38%
4★
50%
48%
71%
71%
50%
25%
38%
3★
25%
2%
0%
10%
22%
0%
13%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
13%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University Life in Limerick

I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close