ESADE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Escuela Europea de Negocios vs Universidad de Oviedo vs Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM

Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Europea de Negocios (5.00)
ESADE Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 0/5 categories
Escuela Europea de Negocios: wins 3/5 categories
Universidad de Oviedo: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad CEU Fernando III - CEU UF3: wins 1/5 categories
Advantere School of Management: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
4.40
Read more reviews
48 reviews
×
Best programme: BBA
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Information Systems Engineering
Best programme: Master’s in International Management (MIM)
Category ratings
Facilities
3.89
4.13
4.00
3.81
3.50
5.00
Win
4.69
Location
3.90
4.13
4.00
4.25
4.00
3.00
4.79
Win
Professors
4.37
4.13
5.00
Win
3.85
4.33
4.00
4.81
Internationality
4.07
3.69
5.00
3.95
3.83
5.00
4.59
Student life
4.03
3.88
5.00
3.82
4.17
5.00
4.77
Value
4.23
4.00
5.00
Win
3.90
3.83
4.00
4.66
Accommodation
3.78
4.27
5.00
Win
3.64
3.83
4.00
4.34
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive, intense, and up-to-date academic programs with practical application
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth beyond academics, including leadership and diverse experiences
  • +Strong career support, excellent placements, and networking opportunities
  • +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
  • +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
  • +Supportive professor-student relationships
  • +Renowned university status and societal impact
  • +Welcoming and fulfilling study abroad experience
  • +Excellent teaching structure
  • +Excellent professors and teaching quality
  • +Good academic environment and supportive staff
  • +High-quality and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Supportive and attentive faculty
  • +High-quality, well-organized programs
  • +Diverse and international community
  • +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
  • +Integrated and close learning environment
  • +Growing campus and accessible transportation
  • +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
  • +Strong professional network and career preparation
  • +Supportive faculty and international environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor handling of financial matters and logistical challenges.
  • -Lack of focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
  • -Negative social environment and perceived unfair financial practices.
  • -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
  • -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, are frequently criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common source of frustration.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Lack of practical relevance in curriculum and insufficient support for thesis completion.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student progress and degree attainment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Rating summary
What students say

Performance across key university metrics shows varied strengths. Professors receive the highest marks, followed closely by value and internationality. Student life and location also score well. The university's weakest areas are facilities and accommodation, though both still achieve respectable scores.

Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.

Receiving outstanding marks, this institution excels particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Location also stand out with a strong 4. The university's weakest, though still highly positive, area lies in its Facilities and Location, which, while good, did not reach the perfect score achieved in other key aspects.

Evaluations reveal a university with a consistently solid performance across multiple aspects. The location stands out as the strongest area, achieving a high rating of 4.25. On the other hand, accommodation received the lowest score at 3.64. Other areas such as professors, student life, internationality, and value all fall within a competitive range, suggesting a generally positive student experience.

Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.

Remarkable scores are evident across most surveyed aspects of this university. Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong areas, both scoring near perfect marks. Student life and facilities also received very high praise. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Internationality and value for money are also well-regarded.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, a supportive environment, and practical learning opportunities. The remaining ~8% of feedback mentions concerns about value and IT infrastructure.

With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlighted their rewarding acceptance, a welcoming atmosphere, and excellent teaching structure.

Nearly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse and comprehensive curricula, excellent professors, and good facilities. A small portion of negative feedback points to lack of support for final projects and overly theoretical coursework.

With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.

With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97% 4-5 stars), highlighting valuable technical knowledge, practical learning, and professional network development. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
63%
65%
100%
12%
27%
0%
75%
4★
29%
12%
0%
70%
64%
100%
22%
3★
0%
18%
0%
12%
9%
0%
3%
2★
2%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
1★
6%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Networking

Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Precarity

This University claims for international excellence but the reality is very different. Precarity, bad and old fashioned teachers, no accuracy to law or their own institutions. Student rights that are disappeared or bad quality on the practical subjects.

Good, but worthy of improvement

The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"

Nothing to show

Masters international Management

I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close