IESE Business School vs Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - UPC vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC vs Neuro Business School - NBS
Side-by-side comparison from 289 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Supportive and professional faculty, fostering independent problem-solving.
- +Relevant curriculum with a balance of theory and practical application.
- +Excellent facilities, innovative focus, and positive campus environment.
- +Practical, real-world projects and learning
- +Experienced, professional professors with industry insights
- +Collaborative and supportive learning environment
- +Flexible online model and well-structured virtual platform
- +Autonomy and personalized learning pace
- +Accessible and responsive faculty support
- +Practical, applied learning focus
- +Engaging, creative teaching methods
- +Supportive and inspiring instructors
- +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
- +Career advancement & internship opportunities
- +Personal and professional growth
- +Welcoming and safe community
- +Excellent instructors and support
- +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of focus on quality over difficulty
- -Overly competitive and high failure rates in subjects
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Disrespectful and unhelpful staff, particularly regarding international student coordination.
- -Misleading information about teaching methods and the overall student experience.
- -- Administrative and communication issues lead to confusion and lack of support.
- -- Unclear and inconsistent assessment criteria hinder academic progress.
- -- Disorganized content and poor web usability create a frustrating learning experience.
- -Disappointing value for money, especially for full-time programs.
- -Inconsistent and inadequate course materials and instruction.
- -Poor organization and communication from staff.
- -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
- -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is disappointing.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This university receives high marks, particularly for its **Value (4.11)**, indicating strong student satisfaction with the overall return on investment. **Professors (4.01)** are also a significant strength. Among the lower-rated areas, **Internationality (3.78)** and **Location (3.79)** present opportunities for improvement, though still within a generally positive range. Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation all fall comfortably in the upper 3s.
This institution receives its highest marks for its Facilities and Location, both scoring 4.08. Student Life and Internationality are rated at a respectable 3.75. Areas receiving slightly lower scores include Accomodation and Value, both at 3.67, and Professors, at 3.92.
This institution received its highest marks for location, with a score of 3.85. Internationality and value were also strong points, both scoring above 3.7. Conversely, student life presented the weakest area, registering a 2.7. Facilities and accommodation also received mid-range scores. Professors were rated favorably, indicating a generally positive, albeit uneven, university experience.
This institution garners impressive ratings across multiple facets, notably excelling in **Internationality (4.8)** and **Professors (4.75)**. Facilities and Student Life also score highly at 4.65. Areas scoring lower, though still strong, include Location and Accommodation, both at 4.41. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with outstanding marks in its global reach and academic staff.
A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.
This institution receives particularly high marks for **Internationality** (4.92) and **Location** (4.83), indicating a vibrant global presence and desirable setting. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score very well at 4.5. **Value** is rated as the comparatively weakest area at 4.25, though still a respectable score. Professors and student life also maintain strong ratings.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (99%) highlights professional and supportive teachers, effective learning of problem-solving skills, and new, clean campus facilities. Minimal negative feedback exists.
With a 4.14 average rating from 56 reviews, ~86% of students praise the practice-oriented approach and real-world projects. Professors are often industry professionals sharing practical experience. A single negative review questioned student support and hybrid system claims.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting flexibility and a well-structured online platform. A small portion of feedback (~12%) is negative, mentioning issues with instruction clarity, administrative errors, and customer service.
With an average rating of 4.8/5 based on 20 reviews, ~95% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights practical application, creative thinking, and inspiring teachers. A single negative review (5%) found the full-time program costly for limited class hours.
With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.
University students give very positive reviews, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars. They praise welcoming culture, excellent instructors, and effective job placement support. No negative feedback was recorded.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
As a student of the UPC, it must be said that at the level of studies and teaching staff, both the one I have had as well as friends and acquaintances, is excellent. However, as far as facilities are concerned, it leaves much to be desired, and given the university's debt, small (and historical) faculties, such as the nautical one, are negatively affected by each management.
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.
Nothing to show
