Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA vs Universidad Nacional de Lanus - UNLA vs Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento - UNGS
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Academic validity and expert tutors
- +Modern and accessible facilities
- +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
Nothing to show
- +Beautiful, well-maintained campus
- +Professional, dedicated teachers
- +Enriching, supportive learning environment
- +Expert professors and supportive environment
- +Comfortable, large, and safe campus
- +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
- +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
- +Dedicated professors and valuable learning experience
- +Strong sense of professional identity and career preparation
- -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Disorganized administrative processes and poor communication.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and lacks practical application.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution garners outstanding marks across all assessed criteria. Its strengths are evident in consistently perfect scores for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. No specific weaknesses are identified within these ratings, indicating a uniformly excellent student experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, earning a perfect score. It also receives consistently positive feedback for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value, all rated at 4 out of 5. The weakest areas for the university are its location and internationality, both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5.
This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.
Overall, this institution garners positive reviews, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Areas of strength also include **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality**, all rated highly at 4. In contrast, **Facilities** is the lowest-rated aspect, receiving a score of 3.
Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is exclusively positive. Students highlight the beautiful campus and highly professional, dedicated teachers. Negative reviews are non-existent.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a comfortable, safe, and supportive environment. Expert professors and beautiful grounds are praised. No negative feedback was received.
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.
With one review and an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. The reviewer highlighted excellent professors and respectable infrastructure, stating they owe their degree and profession to the university.
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
