Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs San Martin National University - UNSAM vs Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento - UNGS
Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Academic validity and expert tutors
- +Modern and accessible facilities
- +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
- +high academic standards and quality programs
- +excellent professors who are passionate and caring
- +public and tuition-free access to education
- +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
- +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
- +Wide range of specialization options
- +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
- +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
- +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
- +Expert professors and supportive environment
- +Comfortable, large, and safe campus
- +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
- +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Nothing to show
- -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
- -Overcrowded classes and lack of personal attention.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
- -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
- -Disorganized administrative processes and poor communication.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.
This university shows a remarkably strong showing in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving ratings well above four. **Student Life** and **Location** also score highly. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are the weaker aspects, with scores hovering around the three mark, indicating areas for potential improvement within the university's offerings.
This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.
An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, earning a perfect score. It also receives consistently positive feedback for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and overall value, all rated at 4 out of 5. The weakest areas for the university are its location and internationality, both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5.
This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.
Nothing to show
Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.
The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 90% of reviews praising academic quality, professional professors, and student development. Some minor concerns exist regarding thesis process complexity.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a comfortable, safe, and supportive environment. Expert professors and beautiful grounds are praised. No negative feedback was received.
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
