United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Politecnico di Milano vs University of Milano-Bicocca - UNIMIB vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs SDA Bocconi School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 140 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Excellent academic quality and research opportunities
- +Strong industry connections and professional development
- +Challenging yet rewarding technical education
- +Supportive professors and accessible, modern campus
- +Opportunities for social connection and an international environment
- +Good academic programs and extra-curricular activities
- +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
- +Strong career development and industry connections
- +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment
Nothing to show
- +Career-focused and interesting courses
- +Supportive professors and staff
- +Modern and well-equipped campus facilities
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Teaching quality and academic support are poor.
- -Arbitrary grading and a negative campus atmosphere are issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of creative encouragement are problems.
- -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
- -Teachers are perceived as treating students as mere numbers rather than individuals.
- -Concerns exist regarding professor qualifications and the quality of teaching.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive fees and unclear financial policies are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a lack of responsiveness from faculty and administration are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing across various aspects, with Value and Location emerging as its highest-rated categories. Student Life and Internationality also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accommodations are rated the lowest among the surveyed areas. Facilities and Professors fall within the mid-to-high range of the provided scores, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside acknowledged strengths.
Generally well-received, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, boasting the highest rating. **Value** and **Facilities** also received strong scores. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which are rated lower than other aspects. **Professors** and **Student Life** fall within the mid-range of the provided scores.
The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, and location are all highly rated, achieving near-perfect marks. Student life and accommodation also receive positive feedback. However, internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower score compared to other metrics. The overall value of the university is rated very favorably.
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
Approximately 74% of 84 reviews are positive, highlighting excellent academic quality and strong international environments. A small minority, about 5.9%, express dissatisfaction with teaching performance and student support.
~74% of 36 reviews are positive, praising the modern campus, competent professors, and good facilities. A small ~2.8% of feedback is negative, citing poor organization and feeling like a number.
All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.
Nothing to show
All 6 reviews are positive, averaging 4.33/5 stars. Students praise the interesting courses, career opportunities, supportive staff, and good facilities. Some mention a desire for more international focus.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
I have experienced a lot of personalities in this university, some lecturers are very rude when you ask questions, like the thought of you even being slightly confused at what theyre saying is a crime, while some are eager to answer your questions and even welcome it, all in all i personally focus on the good ones because i am here for a purpose. But if you're really sensitive and these things are what you look out for, then this might come as a shock to you.
I am following the degree course in Sociology. I'm really happy with how I'm finding myself at this university. I think the professors are very good and available in giving any kind of information. Very active university life with numerous initiatives. Clean and sunny environment. I highly recommend it.
The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
